Konsistensi Struktur Argument by Commitment dalam Editorial Harian Bisnis Indonesia: Perspektif Douglas Walton Argument by Commitment Construction Consistency in Editorial Rubrics of Bisnis Indonesia Daily News: Douglas Walton Perspective

Main Article Content

Pilipus Wai Lawet
Yuliana Setyaningsih

Abstract

Consistency is very essential in writing editorial rubrics because it shows commitments of the author and his institution. Author and media institution who have high commitments in writing editorial argumentation can increase the level of readers' confidence toward the content of editorials. This research is intended to optimize the consistency of the construction of argument by commitment in Bisnis Indonesia editorials. Data collection methods used were documentation and interview methods. The research data were in the form of editorial texts containing arguments. The data analysis method used was the qualitative data analysis. Besides, the content analysis method was also applied. The research result showed that there were inconsistencies of arguments by commitment used in the editorials. The inconsistencies occured because a deep understanding of the concept of argument by commitment in writing editorials has not been understood well by editorial writers. Therefore, the steps of optimizing the consistency of argument by commitment must be done as follows: (1) understanding the concept of argument by commitment, (2) designing an argument by commitment scheme, and (3) asking critical questions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lawet, P. W., & Setyaningsih, Y. (2020). Konsistensi Struktur Argument by Commitment dalam Editorial Harian Bisnis Indonesia: Perspektif Douglas Walton . Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(3), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i3.103
Section
Articles

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Peneltian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta. PT. Rineka Cipta.
Al-Khatib, K., Wachsmuth, H., Kiesel, J., Hagen, M., & Stein, B. (2016). A News Editorial Corpus for Mining Argumentation Strategies. COLING 2016-26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2016: Technical Papers, 3433–3443.
Bal, B. K. (2014). Analyzing Opinions and Argumentation in News Editorials and Op-eds. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(1), 22-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.14569/SpecialIssue.2014.040104
Hill, W. F. (2010). Theories of Learning (Konsepsi, Komparasi, dan Signifikasi). Bandung: Nusa Media.
Anggara, R. F. (2015). Analisis Isi Tajuk Rencana tentang Korupsi di Surat Kabar Harian Kedaulatan Rakyat. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(1), 78-95.
Moleong. L. J. (2013). Meteodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya
Pertiwi, L. B. (2018). Argumentasi dalam Teks Editorial Harian Suara Merdeka. Basindo: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um007v2i12018p001
Padiatra, A. M. (2018). Ketika Pers Bicara Korupsi: Analisis Editorial Harian Pedoman pada Awal Orde Baru 1969–1974. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 5(2), 103-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.17510/paradigma.v5i2.51
Rybacki, K, C. & Rybacki, D. J. (1991). Advocacy and Opposition: An Introduction to Argumentation. Prentince Hall: Englewood Cliffts.
Sembiring, J. & Surya, E. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual (CTL) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa pada Materi Himpunan di Kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Medan. FMIPA UNIMED.
Seyler, D. U. (2012). Read, Reason, Write: An Argument Text and Reader. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Setyaningsih, Y. (2016). Pola Argumen Paragraf Argumentatif pada Artikel Jurnal Terakreditasi Bidang Ekonomi (Perspektif Logika Toulmin). Adabiyyat, 15(2), 136-156. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15202
Stenberg, R. J. (2008). Psikologi Kognitif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sudjana, N. (2011). Penilaian Proses Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1979). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Tim Buku Kompas. (2008). Buku Panduan Kompas. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Walton, D. N. (2004). Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument. Argumentation, 18(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARGU.0000046706.45919.83.
Walton, D. (2005). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807039
https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/paham, diakses pada 6 Maret 2020.