Tindak Tutur Remaja sebagai Anak Tunggal dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari di Kelas: Kajian Sosiopragmatik Action of Adolescent as a Single Child in Daily Class Interactions: Sociopragmatic Study

Main Article Content

Septyana Endang Herwilis Syukur
Rahmat Soe’oed
Widyatmike Gede Mulawarman

Abstract

This study aims to describe (1) the speech acts of adolescents as an only child in daily interactions in class, (2) the variety of politeness in speech acts in the language of adolescents as an only child in daily interactions in class, (3) supporting factors and speech act inhibiting factors in the speaking ability of adolescents as an only child in speaking ability. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, questionnaires, observation and documentation. The research approach is descriptive qualitative. Data validity analysis used triangulation. Data analysis techniques, namely using content analysis include data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that first, based on the form of delivery, direct and indirect speech acts were found. In addition, based on the disclosure of meaning, it was found that literal and non-literal speech acts were found. There were many differences in speech acts performed between the main object and the object of comparison. Second, there are quite different kinds of politeness between the main object and the object of comparison. Third, the main object has two supporting factors, namely the work background of the parents and the use of language. Whereas in the inhibiting factor, the main object has two inhibiting factors, namely politeness and activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Syukur, S. E. H., Soe’oed, R., & Mulawarman, W. G. (2020). Tindak Tutur Remaja sebagai Anak Tunggal dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari di Kelas: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(4), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i4.128
Section
Articles

References

Ainin, N., Rokhmansyah, A., & Purwanti. (2019). Tipe Tuturan Remaja Perempuan Yatim dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari: Kajian Pragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v2i1.14
Christiandy. (2015). Analisis Tindak Tutur Kru Bus dengan Penumpang Bus Jurusan Yogyakarta-Parangtritis (Kajian Pragmatik). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2010). Teori Kepribadian. Edisi Ke-7. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Gunarsa, S. D. (2011). Konseling dan Psikoterapi. Jakarta: Libri.
Gunarsa, S. D. & Gunarsa, Y. S. D. (2008). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Hasanah, U. (2016). Pola Asuh Orangtua dalam Membentuk Karakter Anak. Elementary: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 72-82. Retrieved from https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/elementary/article/view/pola-asuh-orangtua-dalam-membentuk-karakter-anak
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, B. L., Loftus, G. R., & Wagenaar, W. A. (2009). Atkinson & Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology (15th Edition). In Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Andover: Cengage Learning EMEA.
Nurlaila, M. (2016). Pengaruh Bahasa Daerah (Ciacia) terhadap Perkembangan Bahasa Indonesia Anak Usia 2 Sampai 6 Tahun di Desa Holimombo Jaya. Retorika, 9(2), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v9i2.3801
Purba, A. (2011). Tindak Tutur dan Peristiwa Tutur. Pena: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1), 77-92. Retrieved from https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pena/article/view/1426
Ratnawati, I. I. (2018). Kajian Pragmatik Percakapan Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA Advent Balikpapan. Stilistika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 3(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33654/sti.v3i1.499
Rokhmansyah, A., Purwanti, Ainin, N. (2019). Pelanggaran Maksim pada Tuturan Remaja Perempuan Yatim: Kajian Psikopragmatik. JP-BSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia), 4(1), 47-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jp-bsi.v4i1.887
Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). A Comparative Sociopragmatic Study of Ostensible Invitations in English and Farsi. Speech Communication, 48(8), 903-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.12.001
Sari, S. L., Devianti, R., & Safitri, N. (2018). Kelekatan Orangtua untuk Pembentukan Karakter Anak. Educational Guidance and Counseling Development Journal, 1(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.24014/egcdj.v1i1.4947
Stukan, D. (2018). Sociopragmatic Failure: Struggling with Cross-Cultural Differences in Communication. Open Journal for Anthropological Studies, 2(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojas.0201.03027s
Sugiyono. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Walgito, B. (2010). Pengantar Psikologi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Wardyaningrum, D. (2013). Komunikasi untuk Penyelesaian Konflik dalam Keluarga: Orientasi Percakapan dan Orientasi Kepatuhan. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia, 2(1), 47-58. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uai.ac.id/index.php/SPS/article/view/110