Bahasa Bugis dalam perspektif Islam pada mahasiswa Sulawesi di D.I. Yogyakarta Bugis language in Islamic perspective among Sulawesi students in Yogyakarta
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indonesian is part of the Austronesian language family and has a unique script system known as Lontara. Although Indonesian is more dominant, the Bugis language still plays an important role in maintaining the cultural identity and traditions of the Bugis people. This study was conducted to find differences in Bugis speech between students from Southeast Sulawesi in Yogyakarta and their home regions. The object of this research is 22 Southeast Sulawesi students who live in a student dormitory in Yogyakarta. A qualitative-descriptive approach based on Lev Vygotsky's theory was used in this study. The results show that dialectal variations, different ethnic backgrounds, historical and cultural factors, the use of Arabic letters in Bugis writing, the level of formality of use, and the development of Bugis language literature cause the differences in language speech. The findings highlight the importance of Bugis language preservation by Sulawesi students and the strengthening of the community's cultural identity, provide a new contribution to the development of literature on Bugis language development, especially in the Yogyakarta area, and provide new insights into efforts to preserve Indonesian culture.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Azis, A. D., Mahyuni, M., Syahdan, S., & Yusra, K. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kepunahan Bahasa Daerah di Tanah Rantau. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v5i1.27
Azra, A. (2018). Cultural Pluralism in Indonesia: Continuous Reinventing of Indonesian Islam in Local, National and Global Contexts. Asia-Pacific Journal on Religion and Society, 2(2), 56–60. https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/asiapacific/article/view/6399
Basid, A., Sumiyati, N., Nafisah, N., & Fauziyah, E. (2022). Fillmore’s Case Grammar Analysis of “Jinniyāt Jabal Kumang” Film Dialogues. Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 7(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v7i1.5021
Blunden, A. (2021). Tool and Sign in Vygotsky’s Development. In Hegel, Marx and Vygotsky: Essays on Social Philosophy (pp. 113–142). Brill.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2017). Vygotskian and Post-Vygotskian Approach: Focusing on “The Future Child.” In L. E. Cohen & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds.), Theories of Early Childhood Education (pp. 62–74). Routledge.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Erniati, E. (2019). Pemertahanan Bahasa Bugis di Kota Ambon. Totobuang, 6(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.26499/ttbng.v6i2.93
Ghani, N., Jamian, A. R., & Jobar, N. A. (2022). The Relationship Between Language Acquisition and Theory of Social Interactionist. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(4), 54–59. https://ejicccm.com/index.php/icccmjssh/article/view/32
Graham, P., Kurz, C., & Batamula, C. (2023). Finding Vygotsky in Early Childhood Deaf Education: Sociocultural Bodies and Conversations. American Annals of the Deaf, 168(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2023.a904168
Gusnawaty, G., Lukman, L., & Nurwati, A. (2022). A Closer Look on Linguistic Politeness among Bugis Youth: Tabék in Situational and Philosophical Context. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i2.9870
Irshad, S., Maan, M. F., Batool, H., & Hanif, A. (2021). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): An Evaluative Tool for Language Learning and Social Development in Early Childhood Education. Multicultural Education, 7(6), 234–242. http://ijdri.com/me/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/25.pdf
Jaya, J. (2019). Proses Asimilasi Bunyi Konsonan Bahasa Bugis Dialek Sigeri : Kajian Transformasi Generatif. Tolis Ilmiah; Jurnal Penelitian, 1(2), 124–129. https://ojs.umada.ac.id/index.php/Tolis_Ilmiah/article/view/7
Mahmud, M. (2011). Grammatical Expression of Bugis Politeness. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v5i1.618
Muradi, A. (2018). Pemerolehan Bahasa dalam Perspektif Psikolinguistik dan Alquran. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i2.2245
Nardo, A. (2021). Exploring a Vygotskian Theory of Education and Its Evolutionary Foundations. Educational Theory, 71(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12485
Privalova, I. V. (2021). Methods of Psycholinguistic Research as Possible Cognitive Approaches to Linguistic Data Processing. In N. V. Sukhova, T. Dubrovskaya, & Y. A. Lobina (Eds.), Multimodality, Digitalization and Cognitivity in Communication and Pedagogy (pp. 181–201). Springer.
Rahmi, R., Saleh, M., & Sultan, S. (2023). Kalimat Perintah dalam Terjemahan Al-Qur’an Surah An-Nahl. Nuances of Indonesian Language, 4(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.51817/nila.v4i1.318
Rijal, A. S. (2022). Penggunaan Bahasa dalam Ranah Pariwisata; Studi di Kawasan Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung Maros, Sulawesi Selatan. SASDAYA: Gadjah Mada Journal of Humanities, 5(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.22146/sasdayajournal.73287
Rustan, A., & Cangara, H. (2011). Perilaku komunikasi orang Bugis dari perspektif Islam. KAREBA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 91–106. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/kareba/article/view/373
Sah, M. F. M., & Jaafar, S. R. S. (2021). Strategi Adaptasi Kata Pinjaman dalam Bahasa Bugis: Koresponden-OO. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 21(3), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2103-04
Salim, M. M., & Abbas, A. (2020). Vernakularisasi Al-Qur’an di Tanah Bugis: Tinjauan Metodologis Terjemahan Al-Qur’an Karya Anregurutta Muh. Yunus Maratan. Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian, 15(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.31332/ai.v0i0.2179
Sari, A. V. (2023). Pembaca Sebagai Penikmat Karya Sastra: Menguak Topik Teratas Fiksimini di Twitter. Journal of Literature and Education, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.69815/jle.v1i1.8
Setiawati, R. D. (2019). Variasi Bahasa dalam Situasi Tidak Formal pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia di Universitas Tadulako. Bahasa Dan Sastra, 4(1), 1–11. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/BDS/article/view/12245
Sriwahyuni, S., & Samad, A. G. (2021). Interferensi Bahasa Bugis terhadap Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia Siswa SMP dalam Berkomunikasi. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 2(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v2i2.111
Sukmawati, N. F. N. (2017). Kesamaan Kosakata Bahasa Bugis dan Bahasa Muna. Kandai, 10(2), 165–177. https://ojs.badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/jurnal/index.php/kandai/article/view/320
Suparman. (2021). Split pada Bahasa Bugis dan Bahasa Tae’. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(2), 167–174. https://www.dmi-journals.org/deiktis/article/view/162
Tafsirweb. (2024). Tafsir Ringkas Kementrian Agama RI / Surat An-Nahl Ayat 78. TafsirWeb. https://tafsirweb.com/4426-surat-an-nahl-ayat-78.html