Needs analysis of expository writing teaching materials based on Toulmin's argumentation patterns Analisis kebutuhan bahan ajar menulis eksposisi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin
Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 15, 2024
Keywords:
need analysis, teaching materials, exposition writing, Toulmin's argumentation pattern
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the needs of teaching materials for writing exposition based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern. Through observations, interviews, and document studies, it was found that students' argumentation skills still tend to be low. The existing teaching materials are considered inadequate in providing clear and systematic guidance to build strong arguments. The results of the analysis show that students predominantly use basic argumentation patterns and have difficulty in developing complex argumentation. This can also be seen from the learning outcomes of students who are at an average score of 61.37 in the poor category. This illustrates that most learners still need significant improvement in writing expositions. Then, the standard deviation of 12.854 shows the diversity of learners' abilities in writing expositions. This is in line with the results of interviews with teachers that students' abilities in writing expositions vary; most are still in the basic stage, but there are also students who show good potential, although they still need further guidance. Therefore, the development of teaching materials that integrate Toulmin's argumentation pattern is considered very relevant to improve students' exposition writing skills.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Boeriswati, E., Eriyani, R. N., & Wibawani, S. (2024). Needs analysis of expository writing teaching materials based on Toulmin’s argumentation patterns. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 7(4), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v7i4.1071
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Abduh, N. K., Sastromiharjo, A., & Anshori, D. S. (2019). Pola Argumentasi pada Genre Teks Eksposisi Karangan Siswa SMA. Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7372
Afrilia, R., Hasnunidah, N., & Maulina, D. (2022). Argumentation skill through a scientific approach: Study at different school accreditations rating. Jurnal Biolokus, 5(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v5i2.1339
Agustina, R., Maiza, S., & Melati, R. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Menulis Teks Anekdot Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Kerinci. Journal on Education, 6(1), 358–365. https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v10i3.15159
Annisah, S., Zulela, Z., & Boeriswati, E. (2020). Analysis of student needs for mathematics teaching materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1469(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012156
Azhary, L., & Ratmanida. (2021). The Implementation of 21 st Century Skills (Communication, Collaboration, Creativity and Critical Thinking) in English Lesson Plan at MTsN 6 Agam. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(4), 608–623. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i4.114944
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1), 93–99. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/biodidaktika/article/view/16108
Kemala, A., Sastromiharjo, A., & Mulyati, Y. (2020). Students’ Problems in Writing Exposition Texts: Structure, Function, and Effectiveness. Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2019), 430, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200406.003
Lawet, P. W., & Setyaningsih, Y. (2020). Konsistensi Struktur Argument by Commitment dalam Editorial Harian Bisnis Indonesia: Perspektif Douglas Walton. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i3.103
Lutfianti, K. D., Subyantoro, & Haryadi. (2022). The Development of Teaching Materials for Writing Exposition Text Using the Application of Lectora Inspire Oriented Critical Thinking Skill and Containing the Values of Deliberation. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(2), 158–167. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/seloka/article/view/57633
Mahsun. (2014). Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noto, G. M., Sofendi, S., Wati, R. I., Hartono, H., & Putri, R. I. I. (2022). Climate Change Exposition Reading Materials for Senior High School Textbook: Students’ Needs Analysis. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2429–2436. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1030
Noviyanti, N. I., Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills Based on Differences in Academic Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1).https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034
Perdanasari, A., Sudiyanto, & Sangka, K. B. (2021). Development Needs Analysis of Teaching Materials for Improving Critical Thinking Skills Students in Century 21. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012035
Pritasari, A. C., Dwiastuti, S., Probosari, R. M., & Sajidan. (2015). Problem Based Learning Implementation in Class X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.4185
Putri, M. D., & Rusdiana, D. (2017). Identifying Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill At Junior High School 1 Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, III(9), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424
Santi, A., Kurniawan, K., & Abidin, Y. (2023). Analisis Kebutuhan Desain Model Pembelajaran Komunitas Sosial untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Eksposisi di SMK. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.673
Sari, A., Rasyid, Y., & Muliastuti, L. (2022). Development of Exposition Text Writing Materials based on Contextual Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 51(3), 122–131. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPP/article/view/15924
Situmorang, N. M. Y. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Siswa melalui Teknik Guiding Questions. Journal of Education Action Research, 2(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v2i2.12190
Supriyadi, A. (2023). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking by Employing Toulmin Pattern of Argumentation. Education of English as A Foreign Language, 6(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.educafl.2023.006.02.03
Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation Skill Profile Using “Toulmin Argumentation Pattern” Analysis of High School Student at Subang on Topic Hydrostatic Pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Tressyalina, Noveria, E., Arief, E., Wulandari, E., & Ramadani, N. T. (2023). Analisis Kebutuhan E-LKPD Interaktif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Teks Eksposisi. Educaniora: Journal of Education and Humanities, 1(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.59687/educaniora.v1i1.1
Wulandari, I. A., Nurhadi, & Roekhan. (2024). Needs Analysis for Developing Exposition Writing Materials Using the DTMT Method for Senior High School Students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(3), 3237–3247. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5357
Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Nature of Science and Socioscientific Issues: a Dialogue Between Two Researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
Yustina, A., & Ramly, R. (2021). Development of Teaching Materials for Writing Exposition Texts Based on Potential Wajo Areas in Junior High School. Nuances of Indonesian Language, 1(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.51817/nila.v1i2.59
Zain, F. M., Osman, Z., Kasim, M., Ismail, N. H., & Rahman, F. A. (2023). Edmodo as a 21st Century Learning Tool to Enhance 4C Skills of Malay Language Management Undergraduates. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(7), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.7.1902
Afrilia, R., Hasnunidah, N., & Maulina, D. (2022). Argumentation skill through a scientific approach: Study at different school accreditations rating. Jurnal Biolokus, 5(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v5i2.1339
Agustina, R., Maiza, S., & Melati, R. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Menulis Teks Anekdot Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Kerinci. Journal on Education, 6(1), 358–365. https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v10i3.15159
Annisah, S., Zulela, Z., & Boeriswati, E. (2020). Analysis of student needs for mathematics teaching materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1469(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012156
Azhary, L., & Ratmanida. (2021). The Implementation of 21 st Century Skills (Communication, Collaboration, Creativity and Critical Thinking) in English Lesson Plan at MTsN 6 Agam. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(4), 608–623. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i4.114944
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1), 93–99. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/biodidaktika/article/view/16108
Kemala, A., Sastromiharjo, A., & Mulyati, Y. (2020). Students’ Problems in Writing Exposition Texts: Structure, Function, and Effectiveness. Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2019), 430, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200406.003
Lawet, P. W., & Setyaningsih, Y. (2020). Konsistensi Struktur Argument by Commitment dalam Editorial Harian Bisnis Indonesia: Perspektif Douglas Walton. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i3.103
Lutfianti, K. D., Subyantoro, & Haryadi. (2022). The Development of Teaching Materials for Writing Exposition Text Using the Application of Lectora Inspire Oriented Critical Thinking Skill and Containing the Values of Deliberation. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(2), 158–167. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/seloka/article/view/57633
Mahsun. (2014). Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noto, G. M., Sofendi, S., Wati, R. I., Hartono, H., & Putri, R. I. I. (2022). Climate Change Exposition Reading Materials for Senior High School Textbook: Students’ Needs Analysis. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2429–2436. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1030
Noviyanti, N. I., Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills Based on Differences in Academic Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1).https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034
Perdanasari, A., Sudiyanto, & Sangka, K. B. (2021). Development Needs Analysis of Teaching Materials for Improving Critical Thinking Skills Students in Century 21. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012035
Pritasari, A. C., Dwiastuti, S., Probosari, R. M., & Sajidan. (2015). Problem Based Learning Implementation in Class X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.4185
Putri, M. D., & Rusdiana, D. (2017). Identifying Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill At Junior High School 1 Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, III(9), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424
Santi, A., Kurniawan, K., & Abidin, Y. (2023). Analisis Kebutuhan Desain Model Pembelajaran Komunitas Sosial untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Eksposisi di SMK. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.673
Sari, A., Rasyid, Y., & Muliastuti, L. (2022). Development of Exposition Text Writing Materials based on Contextual Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 51(3), 122–131. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPP/article/view/15924
Situmorang, N. M. Y. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Siswa melalui Teknik Guiding Questions. Journal of Education Action Research, 2(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v2i2.12190
Supriyadi, A. (2023). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking by Employing Toulmin Pattern of Argumentation. Education of English as A Foreign Language, 6(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.educafl.2023.006.02.03
Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation Skill Profile Using “Toulmin Argumentation Pattern” Analysis of High School Student at Subang on Topic Hydrostatic Pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Tressyalina, Noveria, E., Arief, E., Wulandari, E., & Ramadani, N. T. (2023). Analisis Kebutuhan E-LKPD Interaktif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Teks Eksposisi. Educaniora: Journal of Education and Humanities, 1(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.59687/educaniora.v1i1.1
Wulandari, I. A., Nurhadi, & Roekhan. (2024). Needs Analysis for Developing Exposition Writing Materials Using the DTMT Method for Senior High School Students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(3), 3237–3247. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5357
Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Nature of Science and Socioscientific Issues: a Dialogue Between Two Researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
Yustina, A., & Ramly, R. (2021). Development of Teaching Materials for Writing Exposition Texts Based on Potential Wajo Areas in Junior High School. Nuances of Indonesian Language, 1(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.51817/nila.v1i2.59
Zain, F. M., Osman, Z., Kasim, M., Ismail, N. H., & Rahman, F. A. (2023). Edmodo as a 21st Century Learning Tool to Enhance 4C Skills of Malay Language Management Undergraduates. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(7), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.7.1902