Language games in the Dayak tribe: a study of meaning and language structure Permainan bahasa pada suku Dayak: kajian makna dan struktur bahasa
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the dynamics of language use, particularly the Dayak Maanyan language in Kalimantan, using the framework of language games in Wittgenstein's philosophy of language. This study focuses on analyzing the orientation of thought in the use of the Dayak Maanyan language, outlining the rules of games in its expressions, and evaluating the compatibility of Wittgenstein's concept of language games with the Dayak Maanyan language. Utilizing a qualitative approach through literature studies, data were collected from various relevant scientific publications on the Dayak language and culture, as well as Wittgenstein's theory of language games. The findings reveal that the Dayak Maanyan language, through its diverse dialects and communicative practices, serves not only as a tool for communication, but also as a medium for strengthening social identity and preserving cultural traditions. This language reflects the cultural values and social structures of the Dayak community, in which the meaning of language emerges from its contextual use in daily life and specific social practices. These results align with Wittgenstein's philosophical concept, which emphasizes that meaning arises from use. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship between language, meaning, and social practices in multicultural societies, particularly in the Dayak community.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Argatha, M. F. (2016). Tindih Tertib-Tapsile of the Sasak Tribe in the Perspective of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Analytical Philosophy [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/97115
Barrett, J. A., & VanDrunen, J. (2022). Language Games and the Emergence of Discourse. Synthese, 200, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03645-7
Basori, B., Herlinawati, L., Rusnandar, N., & Harsono, T. D. (2023). Nilai-Nilai Perilaku terhadap Sesama Manusia yang Tercermin dalam Petatah-Petitih Dayak Maanyan. Jurnal Tradisi Lisan Nusantara, 3(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.51817/jtln.v3i1.639
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton de Gruyter.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Edwards, G. (2023). Language Games in the Ivory Tower. In A. Skilbeck & P. Standish (Eds.), Wittgenstein and Education: On Not Sparing Others the Trouble of Thinking (pp. 271–293). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119912262.ch19
Finch, H. L. R. (1977). Wittgenstein, the Later Philosophy: An Exposition of the Philosophical Investigations. Humanities Press.
Gumilar, T. (2016). Regional Languages in Indonesian Educational System: A Comparison Study of Javanese, Sundanese and Dayak Languages Teaching Programs. Investigationes Linguisticae, 33, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.14746/il.2016.33.4
Harahap, C. B. (2018). Fenomena Bahasa Prokem di Komunitas Brigata Curva Sud, Gay, Klitih, dan Waria di Yogyakarta dalam Tinjauan Language Games Ludwig Wittgenstein [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/154260
King, V. T. (1993). The Peoples of Borneo. Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
Marniati, M., & Jaafar, M. F. (2022). The Realisation of the Refusal Speech Act in Tanjung Tanah Dialect of Kerinci. Jurnal Arbitrer, 9(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.9.2.94-106.2022
Pey, A. C., Hanum, I. S., & Wahyuni, I. (2023). Adjektiva Bahasa Dayak Benuaq di Kampung Lambing Kecamatan Muara Lawa Kabupaten Kutai Barat. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 7(4), 1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v7i4.8360
Putri, D. L., & Subiyanto, A. (2023). Konstruksi Verba Serial Direksional pada Bahasa Dayak Ngaju Kalimantan Tengah. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.639
Putri, M., Purwaka, A., Usop, L. S., Perdana, I., & Misnawati. (2023). Tindak Tutur Penolakan Ekspresif dalam Bahasa Dayak Maanyan Paju Epat di Desa Sababilah. Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.59024/atmosfer.v1i1.139
Sagatova, S. (2021). The Analisys of the Theories of Wittgenstein about “Language Game". Emergent: Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL), 2(5), 10–15. https://ejedl.academiascience.org/index.php/ejedl/article/view/41
Saussure, F. de. (2013). Course in General Linguistics. Bloomsbury Academic.
Septiana, D., Santosa, R., & Sumarlam, S. (2019). Riak in Dayak Maanyan Ritual Tradition (An Ethnolinguistics Study). Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 5(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v5i2.1378
Wangge, G. L. L., & Wijanarko, R. (2023). Politik Identitas Era Post-Truth di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Language Games Ludwig Wittgenstein. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i2.53628
Wittgenstein, L. (1986). Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Wurm, S. A., & Hattori, S. (Eds.). (1981). Language Atlas of the Pacific Area. Australian National University.