Causes of social conflict in Okky Madasari’s novel 86 based on the perspective of Marxist literary sociology Penyebab konflik sosial dalam novel “86” karya Okky Madasari berdasarkan perspektif sosiologi sastra Marxis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Currently, human interactions' dynamics result in the escalation of social conflicts that are becoming increasingly difficult to resolve. The representation of social conflict is frequently illustrated in literary works, as elucidated in the Marxist sociology of literature theory. Therefore, this research aims to describe the causes of social conflict experienced by Arimbi as the main character in novel 86 based on the perspective of Marxist sociology of literature. The method used was descriptive qualitative with a library approach. The method used was descriptive qualitative with a library approach. This research conducts systematic research according to Creswell, specifically by (1) problem statement; (2) literature review; (3) research design; (4) data collection; (5) data analysis; (6) interpretation; and (7) conclusion. This research results in the discovery, namely a portrait of social conflict in the form of troublesome, bribery, discrimination, economic disparity, collusion. The portrayals of social conflict stem from differences in stance, cultural disparities, and varying interests. Every cause of the social conflict originates from the thoughts or desires of individuals belonging to a social class higher than Arimbi. Conversely, as Arimbi's storyline nears its conclusion, she gets entangled in a conflict with the social class beneath her.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Awan, F. N., Badaruddin, & Mulya, M. B. (2020). Faktor penyebab konflik sosial masyarakat pesisir penambangan pasir laut di pantai labu kabupaten deli serdang. Jurnal Niara, 13(1), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.31849/niara.v13i1.4294
Birchall, I. H. (1977). Marxism and Literature. The Sociological Review, 25(1_suppl), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1977.tb03233.x
Crehan, K. (2018). Antonio Gramsci: towards an ethnographic Marxism. Anuac, 7(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.7340/anuac2239-625X-3453
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Habsari, W. A. L. (2023). Internalisasi nilai pelestarian alam dan pendidikan karakter melalui representasi kejahatan lingkungan dalam sastra anak karya Okky Madasari. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 625–644. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.692
Kristeva, N. S. S. (2011). Negara Marxis dan Revolusi Proletariat. Pustaka Pelajar.
Madasari, O. (2011). 86 (Sebuah Novel). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Manshur, F. M. (2012). Teori Sastra Marxis dan Aplikasinya pada Penelitian Karya Sastra Arab Modern. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 40(1), 122–134. https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jbs/article/view/127
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1973). Karl Marx on society and social change: With selections by Friedrich Engels. University of Chicago Press.
Mudiawati, R. C., Hudiyono, Y., & Suhatmady, B. (2023). Analisis wacana kritis Norman Fairclough terhadap bahasa slogan aksi demonstrasi guru di Samarinda. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 739–762. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.694
Mwetulundila, R. (2016). A Marxist analysis of Ngugi Wa Thiong’o’s novel Matigari. International Journal of Research, 3(10), 26–32. https://www.ijrhss.org/papers/v3-i10/5.pdf
Nandini, R., Putri, B. G. R., Setiawan, S. N., Anggraeni, F., & Fedryansyah, M. (2022). Peran Pendamping Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Dalam Upaya Resolusi Konflik Sosial di Desa Genteng Kecamatan Sukasari, Kabupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 4(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v4i1.38294
Nisbet, R. (2017). Sociology as an Art Form (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129990
Øversveen, E. (2022). Capitalism and alienation: Towards a Marxist theory of alienation for the 21st century. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(3), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211021579
Paulia, S., Sutejo, S., & Astuti, C. W. (2022). Konflik Sosial dalam Novel Bayang Suram Pelangi Karya Arafat Nur. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 9(1), 39–45.
Perry, M. (2021). Marxism and History. Springer.
Riaz, S., Aqeel, M., & Hussain, Z. (2022). The Relationship of Marxism and Literary Theories with the Common Grounds of Phenomenology. Journal of Policy Research (JPR), 8(3), 510–513. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7625089
Risnawati, R., Anshari, A., & Abidin, A. (2016a). Pertentangan dan Kesadaran Kelas dalam Novel Bumi Manusia Karya Pramoedya Ananta Toer (Pendekatan Teori Marxis). Retorika, 9(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v9i1.3795
Siregar, I. (2022). The relationship between conflict and social change in the perspective of expert theory: A literature review. International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies, 2(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjahs.2022.2.1.2
Sulhan, M., & Januri, M. R. (2022). Esensi Agama dalam Konflik Sosial di Kabupaten Poso Menggunakan Teori Karl Marx: Sebuah Literatur Review. Acta Islamica Counsenesia: Counselling Research and Applications, 2(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.59027/aiccra.v2i1.171
Wicaksono, A., Emzir, & Rafli, Z. (2020). History of Indonesia’s War Independence in Novel Larasati by Pramoedya Ananta Toer: New Historicism Approach. International Conference on Education, Language and Society (ICELS), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008993400320040
Wolff, J. (2021). Aesthetics and the Sociology of Art. Routledge.
Worsley, P. (2013). Marx and Marxism. Routledge.