Identity politics in Indonesia: A computer-mediated discourse analysis of hate speech in a virtual environment Politik identitas di Indonesia: Analisis wacana mediasi-komputer terhadap ujaran kebencian dalam lingkungan virtual
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study to analyze the computer-mediated hate speech discourse in a virtual environment. Social media and digital network connectivity allow for almost constant interaction and communication. Technological developments, accompanied by socio-political transformations, have become a widespread area of study for the production of hate speech. It is the subject of much academic research; however, a gap remains in the qualitative space that focuses on the form and function of the speech act. The study employs three distinct yet complementary traditions of discourse analysis to investigate hate speech, aiming to understand how social media users achieve the intended purpose of this type of speech. By examining the use of identity, impropriety, and intertextuality in examples of hate speech, this analysis identifies specific repetitive discursive techniques employed by speakers to achieve their goals. The study argues that to understand the features and styles of online communication, hate speech can be identified as a distinct genre of speech. However, this genre does not operate unchallenged: the data also reveals emergent counter-discourses in which other users engage in resisting hate speech through discursive reframing, sarcastic rebuttals, and appeals to civility norms, thereby shaping a contested digital space.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Wagiati, W., Adji, M., Darmayanti, N., & Zein, M. R. A. (2025). Identity politics in Indonesia: A computer-mediated discourse analysis of hate speech in a virtual environment. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 8(4), 923-940. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i4.1260
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Ablitt, J., & Smith, R. J. (2019). Working out Douglas’s aphorism: Discarded objects, categorisation practices, and moral inquiries. The Sociological Review, 67(4), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119854271
Albertson, B. L. (2015). Dog-whistle politics: Multivocal communication and religious appeals. Political Behavior, 37(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9265-x
Ali, T., Buergelt, P. T., Maypilama, E. L., Paton, D., Smith, J. A., & Jehan, N. (2022). Synergy of systems theory and symbolic interactionism: A passageway for non-Indigenous researchers that facilitates better understanding Indigenous worldviews and knowledges. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1876300
Almatarneh, S., Gamallo, P., Pena, F. J. R., & Alexeev, A. (2019). Supervised classifiers to identify hate speech on English and Spanish Tweets. In A. Jatowt, A. Maeda, & S. Y. Syn (Eds.), Digital libraries at the crossroads of digital information for the future (pp. 23–30). Springer International Publishing.
Athanasiadou, A. (2017). Studies in figurative thought and language. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Beetham, D. (1991a). The normative structure of legitimacy. In D. Beetham (Ed.), The legitimation of power (pp. 64–99). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7_3
Beetham, D. (1991b). Towards a social-scientific concept of legitimacy. In D. Beetham (Ed.), The legitimation of power (pp. 3–41). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7_1
Beetham, D. (2012). Political legitimacy. In The Wiley‐Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 120–129). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444355093.ch11
Beguš, G. (2021). CiwGAN and fiwGAN: Encoding information in acoustic data to model lexical learning with Generative Adversarial Networks. Neural Networks, 139, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2021.03.017
Beguš, G. (2022). Distinguishing cognitive from historical influences in phonology. Language, 98(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0084
Beknazarova, U. U., Almautova, A. B., Yelemessova, S. M., & Abadildayeva, S. K. (2021). The cognitive function of a conceptual metaphor and its methodological foundations. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1312–1324.
Benesch, S. (2023). Dangerous speech. In C. Strippel, S. Paasch-Colberg, M. Emmer, & J. Trebbe (Eds.), Challenges and perspectives of hate speech research (Vol. 12, pp. 185–197). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v12.11
Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., & López de Méndez, A. (2019). Images, civic identity, and cultural narratives of Puerto Rico: Using intertextual articulation to develop culturally responsive practices. Multicultural Perspectives, 21(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2019.1606630
Blumer, H. (2018). Symbolic interaction. In R. W. Budd & B. D. Ruben (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to human communication (p. 20). Routledge.
Briggs, C. L., & Bauman, R. (1992). Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2(2), 131–172. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
Canagarajah, S., & Dovchin, S. (2019). The everyday politics of translingualism as a resistant practice. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1575833
Claramonte, M. C. Á. V. (2019). Violins, violence, translation: Looking outwards. The Translator, 25(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2019.1616407
Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology. In D. D. Jack (Ed.), Everyday life: Reconstruction of social knowledge (p. 27). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Conversationalization of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In The authority of the consumer (p. 15). Routledge.
Francis, L. E., & Adams, R. E. (2019). Two faces of self and emotion in symbolic interactionism: From process to structure and culture—And back. Symbolic Interaction, 42(2), 250–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.383
Fuchs, T., & Schäfer, F. (2021). Normalizing misogyny: Hate speech and verbal abuse of female politicians on Japanese Twitter. Japan Forum, 33(4), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2019.1687564
Han, Y., Wang, Z., Feng, Y., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Characterizing developers’ linguistic behaviors in open source development across their social statuses. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3637306
Haney-López, I. (2014). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford University Press.
Herman, D. T. (1951). Linguistic behaviors: I. Some differentiations in hearer response to verbal stimulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 44(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1951.9710071
Herring, S. C. (2019). The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse (pp. 25–67). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_2
Hoed, B. H. (2015). Semiotik & dinamika sosial budaya. Komunitas Bambu.
Huda, A. I. N., Nisa, A. F., & Al Masjid, A. (2025). Digitalisasi dan bahasa Indonesia: Tantangan melestarikan bahasa Indonesia pada era globalisasi di sekolah dasar. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i2.1189
Iqbal, Y., & Bilali, R. (2018). The impact of acknowledgement and denial of responsibility for harm on victim groups’ perceptions of justice, power, and intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2338
James, V., & Merken, S. (2020). Force or appeal to loved ones: Examining Sykes and Matza’s (1957) techniques of neutralization on female serial killers and their male counterparts. In A. Conyers & T. C. Calhoun (Eds.), Deviance today (p. 15). Routledge.
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2019). Multilingualism and technology: A review of developments in digital communication from monolingualism to idiolingualism. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000102
Kjelsvik, B. (2022). “I have no family”—Identity constructions in an asylum interview. In P. Lane, B. Kjelsvik, & A. B. Myhr (Eds.), Negotiating identities in Nordic migrant narratives: Crossing borders and telling lives (pp. 29–54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89109-1_2
Kopytowska, M., & Baider, F. (2017). From stereotypes and prejudice to verbal and physical violence: Hate speech in context. Language in Society, 13(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2017-0008
Lee, B. H. (2018). Explaining cyber deviance among school-aged youth. Child Indicators Research, 11(2), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9450-2
Ma, Q. (2017). A multi-case study of university students’ language-learning experience mediated by mobile technologies: A socio-cultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1301957
MacAvaney, S., Yao, H.-R., Yang, E., Russell, K., Goharian, N., & Frieder, O. (2019). Hate speech detection: Challenges and solutions. PLoS ONE, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221152
Malmasi, S., & Zampieri, M. (2018). Challenges in discriminating profanity from hate speech. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2017.1409284
McNeil, L. (2017). Languaging about intercultural communication: The occurrence and conceptual focus of intracultural peer collaborative dialogues. Language Awareness, 26(3), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1377723
Mdzanga, N., & Moeng, M. (2020). Critical perspectives on language as a social-justice issue in post-colonial higher-education institutions. In C. McNaught & S. Gravett (Eds.), Embedding social justice in teacher education and development in Africa (p. 14). Routledge.
Mehlman, R. C., & Snyder, C. R. (1985). Excuse theory: A test of the self-protective role of attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.994
Mufwene, S. S. (2022). The linguist, language, and economic development: A commentary on languages, linguistics and development practices. In D. Hill & F. K. Ameka (Eds.), Languages, linguistics and development practices (pp. 267–289). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93522-1_11
Nasrullah, R., Suganda, D., Wagiati, & Riyanto, S. (2019). Recovery patterns and a linguistic therapy model of Sundanese-Indonesian bilingual aphasia: A neurolinguistic study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20243
Nasrullah, R., Suganda, D., Wagiati, & Riyanto, S. (2021). Verbal-lexical expression of Indonesian-speaking persons with Broca’s aphasia. Ilkogretim Online-Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 692–706. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.74
Nurjaya, I. G., & Yasa, I. N. (2022). Pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia secara daring pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.345
Obianika, E. C. (2020). Language as tool of exclusion and dominance of Southeast Nigeria’s indigenous peoples: A historical perspective. In S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.), Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 1675–1693). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_18
Palmieri, M., Shortland, N., & McGarry, P. (2021). Personality and online deviance: The role of reinforcement sensitivity theory in cybercrime. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, Artikel 106745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106745
Paz, M. M. A., Montero-Díaz, J., & Moreno-Delgado, A. (2020). Hate speech: A systematized review. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020973022
Poletto, F., Basile, V., Sanguinetti, M., Bosco, C., & Patti, V. (2021). Resources and benchmark corpora for hate speech detection: A systematic review. Language Resources and Evaluation, 55(2), 477–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09502-8
Porlezza, C. (2019). From participatory culture to participatory fatigue: The problem with the public. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119856684. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119856684
Quayle, E. (2020). Online sexual deviance, pornography and child sexual exploitation material. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 14(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-020-00607-y
Ruytenbeek, N., Ostashchenko, E., & Kissine, M. (2017). Indirect request processing, sentence types and illocutionary forces. Journal of Pragmatics, 119, 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.011
Salsabila, F., Yuliawati, S., & Darmayanti, N. (2023). Konstruksi preposisi “pada” dan “kepada” dalam ragam bahasa internet: Kajian sintaksis berbasis korpus. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.674
Sifianou, M., & Bella, S. (2019). Twitter, politeness, self-presentation. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions (pp. 341–365). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_12
Stryker, S. (2017). Symbolic interactionism: Themes and variations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology (p. 27). Routledge.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1950). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
Tiryaki, E. N. (2017). Identification of justification types and discourse markers in Turkish language teacher candidates’ argumentative texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 63–70.
Turel, O. (2017). Organizational deviance via social networking site use: The roles of inhibition, stress and sex differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.002
Udris, R. (2017). Psychological and social factors as predictors of online and offline deviant behavior among Japanese adolescents. Deviant Behavior, 38(7), 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1197689
Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
Wang, H.-Y., Liu, G.-Z., & Hwang, G.-J. (2017). Integrating socio-cultural contexts and location-based systems for ubiquitous language learning in museums: A state of the art review of 2009–2014. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12424
Williams, R. R. (2019). Recognition, right, and social contract. In D. Breazeale (Ed.), Rights, bodies and recognition (p. 19). Routledge.
Yang, J. (2020). The ethno-metapragmatics of CHOSEN/CHOSUN: The intertextual gap and post-colonial politics in Asia. Language & Communication, 72, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.01.007
Zeller, J. P. (2022). Attitudes on languages, identities and politics at the Ukrainian Black Sea coast in 2020/21. Russian Linguistics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-022-09264-7
Zhang, B. (2025). Affective counterpublics under constraint: Emotion, platform governance, and AI ethics discourse on Chinese social media. AI & SOCIETY, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02437-0
Zhu, M., Herring, S. C., & Bonk, C. J. (2019). Exploring presence in online learning through three forms of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Distance Education, 40(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600365
Zuanetti, P. A., Avezum, M. M. de M., Ferretti, M. I., Pontes-Fernandes, A. C., Nunes, M. E. N., Liporaci, N. M., Fukuda, M. T. H., & Hamad, A. P. A. (2021). Development of language and arithmetic skills: Risk and protective factors. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 139(3), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0280.R1.10122020
Albertson, B. L. (2015). Dog-whistle politics: Multivocal communication and religious appeals. Political Behavior, 37(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9265-x
Ali, T., Buergelt, P. T., Maypilama, E. L., Paton, D., Smith, J. A., & Jehan, N. (2022). Synergy of systems theory and symbolic interactionism: A passageway for non-Indigenous researchers that facilitates better understanding Indigenous worldviews and knowledges. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1876300
Almatarneh, S., Gamallo, P., Pena, F. J. R., & Alexeev, A. (2019). Supervised classifiers to identify hate speech on English and Spanish Tweets. In A. Jatowt, A. Maeda, & S. Y. Syn (Eds.), Digital libraries at the crossroads of digital information for the future (pp. 23–30). Springer International Publishing.
Athanasiadou, A. (2017). Studies in figurative thought and language. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Beetham, D. (1991a). The normative structure of legitimacy. In D. Beetham (Ed.), The legitimation of power (pp. 64–99). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7_3
Beetham, D. (1991b). Towards a social-scientific concept of legitimacy. In D. Beetham (Ed.), The legitimation of power (pp. 3–41). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7_1
Beetham, D. (2012). Political legitimacy. In The Wiley‐Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 120–129). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444355093.ch11
Beguš, G. (2021). CiwGAN and fiwGAN: Encoding information in acoustic data to model lexical learning with Generative Adversarial Networks. Neural Networks, 139, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2021.03.017
Beguš, G. (2022). Distinguishing cognitive from historical influences in phonology. Language, 98(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0084
Beknazarova, U. U., Almautova, A. B., Yelemessova, S. M., & Abadildayeva, S. K. (2021). The cognitive function of a conceptual metaphor and its methodological foundations. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1312–1324.
Benesch, S. (2023). Dangerous speech. In C. Strippel, S. Paasch-Colberg, M. Emmer, & J. Trebbe (Eds.), Challenges and perspectives of hate speech research (Vol. 12, pp. 185–197). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v12.11
Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., & López de Méndez, A. (2019). Images, civic identity, and cultural narratives of Puerto Rico: Using intertextual articulation to develop culturally responsive practices. Multicultural Perspectives, 21(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2019.1606630
Blumer, H. (2018). Symbolic interaction. In R. W. Budd & B. D. Ruben (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to human communication (p. 20). Routledge.
Briggs, C. L., & Bauman, R. (1992). Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2(2), 131–172. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
Canagarajah, S., & Dovchin, S. (2019). The everyday politics of translingualism as a resistant practice. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1575833
Claramonte, M. C. Á. V. (2019). Violins, violence, translation: Looking outwards. The Translator, 25(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2019.1616407
Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology. In D. D. Jack (Ed.), Everyday life: Reconstruction of social knowledge (p. 27). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Conversationalization of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In The authority of the consumer (p. 15). Routledge.
Francis, L. E., & Adams, R. E. (2019). Two faces of self and emotion in symbolic interactionism: From process to structure and culture—And back. Symbolic Interaction, 42(2), 250–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.383
Fuchs, T., & Schäfer, F. (2021). Normalizing misogyny: Hate speech and verbal abuse of female politicians on Japanese Twitter. Japan Forum, 33(4), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2019.1687564
Han, Y., Wang, Z., Feng, Y., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Characterizing developers’ linguistic behaviors in open source development across their social statuses. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3637306
Haney-López, I. (2014). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford University Press.
Herman, D. T. (1951). Linguistic behaviors: I. Some differentiations in hearer response to verbal stimulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 44(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1951.9710071
Herring, S. C. (2019). The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse (pp. 25–67). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_2
Hoed, B. H. (2015). Semiotik & dinamika sosial budaya. Komunitas Bambu.
Huda, A. I. N., Nisa, A. F., & Al Masjid, A. (2025). Digitalisasi dan bahasa Indonesia: Tantangan melestarikan bahasa Indonesia pada era globalisasi di sekolah dasar. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i2.1189
Iqbal, Y., & Bilali, R. (2018). The impact of acknowledgement and denial of responsibility for harm on victim groups’ perceptions of justice, power, and intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2338
James, V., & Merken, S. (2020). Force or appeal to loved ones: Examining Sykes and Matza’s (1957) techniques of neutralization on female serial killers and their male counterparts. In A. Conyers & T. C. Calhoun (Eds.), Deviance today (p. 15). Routledge.
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2019). Multilingualism and technology: A review of developments in digital communication from monolingualism to idiolingualism. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000102
Kjelsvik, B. (2022). “I have no family”—Identity constructions in an asylum interview. In P. Lane, B. Kjelsvik, & A. B. Myhr (Eds.), Negotiating identities in Nordic migrant narratives: Crossing borders and telling lives (pp. 29–54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89109-1_2
Kopytowska, M., & Baider, F. (2017). From stereotypes and prejudice to verbal and physical violence: Hate speech in context. Language in Society, 13(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2017-0008
Lee, B. H. (2018). Explaining cyber deviance among school-aged youth. Child Indicators Research, 11(2), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9450-2
Ma, Q. (2017). A multi-case study of university students’ language-learning experience mediated by mobile technologies: A socio-cultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1301957
MacAvaney, S., Yao, H.-R., Yang, E., Russell, K., Goharian, N., & Frieder, O. (2019). Hate speech detection: Challenges and solutions. PLoS ONE, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221152
Malmasi, S., & Zampieri, M. (2018). Challenges in discriminating profanity from hate speech. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2017.1409284
McNeil, L. (2017). Languaging about intercultural communication: The occurrence and conceptual focus of intracultural peer collaborative dialogues. Language Awareness, 26(3), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1377723
Mdzanga, N., & Moeng, M. (2020). Critical perspectives on language as a social-justice issue in post-colonial higher-education institutions. In C. McNaught & S. Gravett (Eds.), Embedding social justice in teacher education and development in Africa (p. 14). Routledge.
Mehlman, R. C., & Snyder, C. R. (1985). Excuse theory: A test of the self-protective role of attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.994
Mufwene, S. S. (2022). The linguist, language, and economic development: A commentary on languages, linguistics and development practices. In D. Hill & F. K. Ameka (Eds.), Languages, linguistics and development practices (pp. 267–289). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93522-1_11
Nasrullah, R., Suganda, D., Wagiati, & Riyanto, S. (2019). Recovery patterns and a linguistic therapy model of Sundanese-Indonesian bilingual aphasia: A neurolinguistic study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20243
Nasrullah, R., Suganda, D., Wagiati, & Riyanto, S. (2021). Verbal-lexical expression of Indonesian-speaking persons with Broca’s aphasia. Ilkogretim Online-Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 692–706. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.74
Nurjaya, I. G., & Yasa, I. N. (2022). Pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia secara daring pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.345
Obianika, E. C. (2020). Language as tool of exclusion and dominance of Southeast Nigeria’s indigenous peoples: A historical perspective. In S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.), Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 1675–1693). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_18
Palmieri, M., Shortland, N., & McGarry, P. (2021). Personality and online deviance: The role of reinforcement sensitivity theory in cybercrime. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, Artikel 106745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106745
Paz, M. M. A., Montero-Díaz, J., & Moreno-Delgado, A. (2020). Hate speech: A systematized review. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020973022
Poletto, F., Basile, V., Sanguinetti, M., Bosco, C., & Patti, V. (2021). Resources and benchmark corpora for hate speech detection: A systematic review. Language Resources and Evaluation, 55(2), 477–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09502-8
Porlezza, C. (2019). From participatory culture to participatory fatigue: The problem with the public. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119856684. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119856684
Quayle, E. (2020). Online sexual deviance, pornography and child sexual exploitation material. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 14(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-020-00607-y
Ruytenbeek, N., Ostashchenko, E., & Kissine, M. (2017). Indirect request processing, sentence types and illocutionary forces. Journal of Pragmatics, 119, 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.011
Salsabila, F., Yuliawati, S., & Darmayanti, N. (2023). Konstruksi preposisi “pada” dan “kepada” dalam ragam bahasa internet: Kajian sintaksis berbasis korpus. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.674
Sifianou, M., & Bella, S. (2019). Twitter, politeness, self-presentation. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions (pp. 341–365). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_12
Stryker, S. (2017). Symbolic interactionism: Themes and variations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology (p. 27). Routledge.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1950). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
Tiryaki, E. N. (2017). Identification of justification types and discourse markers in Turkish language teacher candidates’ argumentative texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 63–70.
Turel, O. (2017). Organizational deviance via social networking site use: The roles of inhibition, stress and sex differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.002
Udris, R. (2017). Psychological and social factors as predictors of online and offline deviant behavior among Japanese adolescents. Deviant Behavior, 38(7), 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1197689
Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
Wang, H.-Y., Liu, G.-Z., & Hwang, G.-J. (2017). Integrating socio-cultural contexts and location-based systems for ubiquitous language learning in museums: A state of the art review of 2009–2014. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12424
Williams, R. R. (2019). Recognition, right, and social contract. In D. Breazeale (Ed.), Rights, bodies and recognition (p. 19). Routledge.
Yang, J. (2020). The ethno-metapragmatics of CHOSEN/CHOSUN: The intertextual gap and post-colonial politics in Asia. Language & Communication, 72, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.01.007
Zeller, J. P. (2022). Attitudes on languages, identities and politics at the Ukrainian Black Sea coast in 2020/21. Russian Linguistics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-022-09264-7
Zhang, B. (2025). Affective counterpublics under constraint: Emotion, platform governance, and AI ethics discourse on Chinese social media. AI & SOCIETY, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02437-0
Zhu, M., Herring, S. C., & Bonk, C. J. (2019). Exploring presence in online learning through three forms of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Distance Education, 40(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600365
Zuanetti, P. A., Avezum, M. M. de M., Ferretti, M. I., Pontes-Fernandes, A. C., Nunes, M. E. N., Liporaci, N. M., Fukuda, M. T. H., & Hamad, A. P. A. (2021). Development of language and arithmetic skills: Risk and protective factors. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 139(3), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0280.R1.10122020