Perkembangan Sejarah dan Isu-Isu Terkini dalam Sastra Bandingan The Historical Development and Current Issues in Comparative Literature

Main Article Content

Dipa Nugraha


This article aims to describe the historical development of comparative literature and its current issues. Comparative literature is a mandatory course in the Indonesian language and literature study program in most Indonesian universities. There are at least six books used as common references in teaching comparative literature in Indonesia. However, these books have not covered recent development in comparative literature, especially the emergence of Chinese school and some new directions within comparative literature. This literature review article collects references from selective authoritative sources on the internet to describe the historical development of comparative literature and its current issues. This article shows that the expansions in comparative literature are intricate with deconstruction and reconstruction of world literature, dialogue and the meeting between West and East, and the presence of the digital age. From the dialogue on world literature and West meeting East vice versa, the Chinese school has its foundation, whilst the presence of the digital age makes comparative literature have new things to explore and work on the usage of the different medium in an umbrella term, intermediality.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nugraha, D. (2021). Perkembangan Sejarah dan Isu-Isu Terkini dalam Sastra Bandingan. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(2), 163-176.
Articles: Literary Studies


Aaron, L. (2008). Writing a literature review article. Radiologic Technology, 80(2), 185–186. Retrieved from
Anderson, W. (1971). Matthew Arnold and the Grounds of Comparatism. Comparative Literature Studies, 8(4), 287–302. Retrieved from
Andersson, B., Beveridge, A., & Singh, K. (2007). Literature review: Academic tip sheet (ed. Bennett, T). Perth, Western Australia: Edith Cowan University.
Baetens, J., & Sánchez-Mesa, D. (2015). Literature in the expanded field: intermediality at the crossroads of literary theory and comparative literature. Interfaces. Image Texte Language, (36), 289–304.
Bassnett, S. (1993). Comparative literature: a critical introduction. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Publishers.
Bassnett, S. (2007). Influence and intertextuality: A reappraisal. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 43(2), 134–146.
Beecroft, A. (2013). Greek, Latin, and the origins of "world literature". CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(5), 1–9.
Bermann, S. (2009). Working in the and zone: Comparative literature and translation. Comparative Literature, 61(4), 432–446. Retrieved from
Bernheimer, C. (1995). Comparative literature in the age of multiculturalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Blanariu, N. (2015). Alternative insights into comparative literature: interdisciplinary, intercultural, intersemiotic: dancing ekphrasis and transmedial narrative. In A. L. Varela & A. Sukla (Eds), The ekphrastic turn: inter-art dialogues (pp. 130–167). Champaign, Illinois: Common Ground Publishing.
Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an effective literature review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 39(2), 86–92.
Boldor, A. (2003). Perspectives on comparative literature. The Interdepartmental Program in Comparative Literature, Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
Boruszko, G. (2013). New technologies and teaching comparative literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(6), 1–9.
Brown, C. (2013). What is ‘Comparative’Literature? Comparative Critical Studies, 10(1), 67–88.
Cao, S. (2007). The Construction of a new paradigm of comparative literature studies. Comparative Literature: East & West, 8(1), 31–56.
Claudon, F. (2018). Ampère and his “promenades” in Rome. Revue de Littérature Comparée, 367(3), 259–277.
D’haen, T. (2013). The Routledge Concise History of World Literature. London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
Damono, S. D. (2005). Pegangan penelitian sastra bandingan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Pusat Bahasa.
Damono, S. D. (2009). Sastra bandingan. Jakarta: Editum.
Domínguez, C., Saussy, H., & Villanueva, D. (2014). Introducing comparative literature: New trends and applications. London: Routledge.
Edmond, J. (2016). No discipline: An introduction to “The indiscipline of comparison”. Comparative Literature Studies, 53(4), 647–659.
Endraswara, S. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra Bandingan. Jakarta: Bukupop.
Endraswara, S. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: CAPS.
Franco, B. (2018). Comparative literature and world literature from goethe to globalization. In W. Fang (Ed), Tensions in world literature: between the local and the universal (pp. 65–76). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fusco, S. (2006). The ironies of comparison: Comparative literature and the re-production of cultural difference between East and West. TRANS- [En Ligne], 2.
Gaither, M. (1961). Literature and the arts. In H. Frenz & N. P. Stallknecht (Eds), Comparative Literature: Method and Perspective (pp. 153–170). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Hart, J. (2006). The futures of comparative literature: North America and beyond. Revue de Littérature Comparée, (1), 5–21.
Honko, L. (1986). Types of Comparison and Forms of Variation. Journal of Folklore Research, 23(2/3), 105–124. Retrieved from
Jay, P. (2014). State of the Discipline: Comparative Literature and Transdisciplinarity. Inquire: Journal of Comparative Literature, 3(2).
Jesson, J., & Lacey, F. (2006). How to do (or not to do) a critical literature review. Pharmacy Education, 6(2), 139–148.
Lefevere, A. (1995). Introduction: Comparative literature and translation. Comparative Literature, 47(1), 1–10.
Lin, H., & Huang, D. (2015). About the Chinese school of comparative literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 17(1), 1–8.
Lu, J. (2017). Reconsiderations on the Crises of Comparative Literature Study. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 19(5), 7.
Propp, V. I. A., Pírková-Jakobsonová, S., Wagner, L. A., & Dundes, A. (1968). Morphology of the Folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Rajewsky, I. (2005). Intermediality, intertextuality, and remediation: A literary perspective on intermediality. Intermédialités: Histoire et Théorie Des Arts, Des Lettres et Des Techniques/Intermediality: History and Theory of the Arts, Literature and Technologies, (6), 43–64.
Romero López, D. (2009). Cyberliteratures: a global perspective. Neohelicon, 36(2), 435–437.
Şahin, E. (2015). On Comparative Literature. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 4(1–1), 5–12.
Saussy, H. (2006). Comparative literature in an age of globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Saussy, H. (2011). The dimensionality of world literature. Neohelicon, 38(2), 289–294.
Teeuw, A. (1984). Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra: Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (1998). Comparative Literature: Theory, Method, Application. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (1999). From comparative literature today toward comparative cultural studies. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 1(3), 1–15.
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (2017). About the Situation of the Discipline of Comparative Literature and Neighboring Fields in the Humanities Today. Comparative Literature: East & West, 1(2), 176–203.
Ty, E. (2018). Teaching Literatures in the Age of Digital Media. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée, 45(2), 213–221.
Wang, N. (2010). The Crisis of Comparative Literature and the Rise of World Literature. Comparative Literature: East & West, 12(1), 28–32.
Wee, B. Van, & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288.
Weisstein, U. (1984). D’où venons nous? Que sommes-nous? Où allons-nous? The Permanent Crisis of Comparative Literature. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée, 167–192.
Wellek, R. (1970). General, Comparative, and National Literature. In Theory of Literature (pp. 46–53). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Wellek, R. (2009). The Crisis of Comparative Literature. In D. Damrosch, N. Melas, & M. Buthelezi (Eds), The Princeton sourcebook in comparative literature: from the European Enlightenment to the global present (pp. 161–172). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1993). Teori Kesusastraan (terj. Melani Budianta). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wolf, W. (2011). (Inter)mediality and the Study of Literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 13(3), 1–9.
Zamora, L. P. (2004). Comparative Literature in an Age of “Globalization.” Comparative Cultural Studies and Latin America, 4(3), 1–8.