Ekologi traumatik: Kekerasan lingkungan dan luka ekologis dalam novel Jejak Balak Traumatic ecology: Environmental violence and ecological wounds in the novel “Jejak Balak”
Main Article Content
Abstract
Forest destruction and ecological violence in the novel Jejak Balak not only impact nature, but also cause psychological and social wounds for the community. This study aims to reveal the forms of ecological trauma represented in the novel through an ecocritical approach with the concept of traumatic ecology from Buell, Nixon, Rigby, Cunsolo, and Woolbright. The analysis was conducted descriptively qualitatively by examining narratives, dialogues, and descriptions that contain traces of ecological wounds. The research findings show seven forms of trauma: physical trauma due to deforestation, collective trauma in the form of mass fear, mythological-ecological trauma through the figure of the inyiak as a forest guardian, trauma of ecological violence seen in repressive actions by officials, moral trauma due to the ethical dilemma between nature conservation and violence, trauma of loss of place when the forest turns into a foreign space, and existential trauma related to the uncertainty of the ecological future. This study confirms that ecological damage produces multidimensional wounds that span from the body, living space, to the cultural consciousness of the community.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
![]()
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Adow, A. H. E., Safeer, M. M., Mohammed, M. G. H., Alam, M. S., & Sulphey, M. M. (2024). A synthesis of academic literature on eco-spirituality. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 10(4), 2163–2178. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2024.04.40
Bock, C. (2024). Ecospiritual praxis: Cultivating connection to address the climate crisis. Religions, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111405
Buell, L. (1999). The ecocritical insurgency. New Literary History, 30(3), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1999.0031
Buell, L. (2005). The future of environmental criticism. Blackwell.
De Diego Cordero, R., Martínez-Herrera, A., Coheña-Jiménez, M., Luchetti, G., & Pérez-Jiménez, J. M. (2024). Ecospirituality and health: A systematic review. Journal of Religion and Health, 63(2), 1285–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01994-2
Ferawati, S. R., & Setiawan, A. (2024). The concept of Tritangtu at Tarawangsa music performance in Pasir Biru Village, Rancakalong, Sumedang. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 51(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.17701/um015v51i22023p243
Fitzpatrick, T. (2023). The rise in ecohorror and ecogothic criticism. (Data Publikasi Tidak Lengkap/Monograf).
Indriyani, J. G., Shofah, N. A., Atikurrahman, M., & Adzhani, S. A. (2025). Religious-ecological values in the Tidung tale “Ketupat Imbiuku” from Let’s Read. Said Annual Roundtable on Indonesia and Religious Affairs, 1(1), 65–80. https://conferences.uinsaid.ac.id/sarira/paper/view/301
Henanggil, M. D. F., Rasyid, Y., Putri, D. S., & Rachman, A. (2023). Model sinektik berbasis ekokritik sastra dalam pembelajaran menulis teks cerpen siswa SMA Padang. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 11(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v11i1.121867
Jilani, H. S., Ahmad, S., & Siddiqa, A. (2023). Ecological trauma: A close reading and eco-critical analysis of Ripples of Our Deeds by Sunday Afolayan. Pakistan Journal of Law, 2(2). https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/99?articlesBySimilarityPage=5
Lovino, S. (2016). Ecocriticism and Italy. Bloomsbury Academic.
Mahendra, D. W. (2025). Environmental trauma and aesthetic ecocriticism in Indonesian climate fiction (Cli-Fi). Art and Society, 4(3), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.63593/as.2709-9830.2025.04.002
Mardikantoro, H. B. (2016). Satuan lingual pengungkap kearifan lokal dalam pelestarian lingkungan. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 44(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.17701/um015v44i12016p47
Middleton, T. A. (2022). Christic witnessing: A practical response to ecological trauma. Practical Theology, 15(5), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2022.2063781
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061194
Prasetyo, L., Benu, N. N., Supartini, N. L., & Sulasmini, N. M. A. (2025). The strategy of storynomics and its application in teaching speaking for university students: A literature review. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i2.1144
Qomariyah, U., Sumartini, S., Neina, Q. A., & Prabaningrum, D. (2024). The impact of women’s roles in the preservation of nature: Analysis of ecofeminism on Ronggeng Dukuh Paruk. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 52(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17701/um015v52i12024p1
Rinahayu, N., & Kristianto, B. (2022). Konstruksi hubungan alam dan manusia melalui kerangka maskulinitas ekologis dalam film Jungle (2017): Ekokritik sastra. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i1.349
Setiyoningsih, T., Suwandi, S., Wardani, N. E., Ulya, C., Setyawan, E., & Zulianto, S. (2024). Representation of the ecological crisis impact in Sumur, a short story written by Eka Kurniawan. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 52(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17701/um015v52i22024p147
Srija, D., & Mahalakshmi, K. (2025). Ecocriticism meets subaltern studies: A framework from the Sundarbans in Amitav Ghosh’s “The Hungry Tide.” International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels
Tigerprints, T., & Woolbright, L. (2011). Wounded planet, wounded people: The possibility of ecological trauma. Clemson University.
Welirang, A. (2022). Jejak balak. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wienhues, A. (2021). Ecological justice and the extinction crisis: Giving living beings their due. Bristol University Press.