Kelayakan Instrumen Evaluasi Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) Bahasa Indonesia Siswa SMA Kelas XI The Feasibility Evaluation Instruments of Indonesian Electronic School Book for Class XI High Schools Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
Curriculum development is directed at the condition of society in shaping the younger generation. The development of the curriculum also has implications for textbooks. Textbooks are an element of supporting educational facilities and infrastructure. This study aims to describe the feasibility of the Evaluation Instrument in the Indonesian Electronic School Book for SMA class XI students of the 2017 revision of the 2013 Curriculum. This research uses a qualitative approach with the method of Content Analysis. Data collection techniques are using literature study techniques and document techniques. The sample of this research was carried out purposively by determining the criteria according to the research objectives. The sample of this research is an evaluation instrument in the Indonesian language BSE of high school students class XI 2013 revision of the 2017 Curriculum. The data of this research are the feasibility of the evaluation instrument in terms of material aspects and language aspects. The percentage of eligibility level is done by dividing the number of scores obtained by the number of total criteria score then multiplied by one hundred. The results showed that the feasibility of the evaluation instrument in terms of the material aspect was 78.8% and in terms of the language aspect was 84.7%. Based on the research results of the BSE Indonesian evaluation instrument, Class XI high school students are categorized as feasible but must be accompanied by other learning resources. Such as the Internet, Print Media, etc. The results of this study can be used as one of the foundations for teachers to study and consider student textbooks, especially the feasibility of evaluation instruments.
Downloads
Article Details
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. United States of America: Longman.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pusat Perbukuan. (2014). Instrumen Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran Tahun 2014. https://bsnp-indonesia.org/2014/05/instrumen-penilaian-buku-teks-pelajaran-tahun-2014/
de Ruiter, L. E., Lieven, E. V. M., Brandt, S., & Theakston, A. L. (2019). Interactions Between Givenness and Clause Order in Children’s Processing of Complex Sentences. Cognition, 198(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104130
Earl. Lorna M. (2013). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning Second Edition. California: SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific.
Efendi, A. (2009). Beberapa Catatan tentang Buku Teks Pelajaran di Sekolah. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 14(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v14i2.334
Hapsari, T. P. R. N., & Wulandari, A. (2020). Analisis Kelayakan Buku Ajar Milenial Berbasis Augmented Reality (AR) sebagai Media Pembelajaran Teks Prosedur di Magelang. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 3(4), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i4.125
Hendrawanto, Y., & Mulyani, M. (2017). Kelayakan Kebahasaan dan Isi Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XII Semester 1 SMA. JPBSI: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 2(2), 58-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jp-bsi.v2i2.246
Huang, P. (2019). Learning , Culture and social interaction textbook interaction: A study of the language and cultural contextualisation of English learning textbooks. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21(2018), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.006
Khairunnisa, F., & Mayrita, H. (2019). Evaluasi Komponen Kelayakan Isi Buku Ajar Bahasa Indonesia: Kesesuaian Materi dengan Kurikulum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 4(1), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.32696/ojs.v4i1.220
Listeani, F. Y. (2020). Penggunaan Kosakata Bahasa Indonesia Pada Generasi Millenial. Basastra, 9(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24114/bss.v9i1.17771
Muslich, M. (2010). Text Book Writing: Dasar-dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan Pemakaian Buku Teks. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2001). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
Nurgiyantoro, B.. (2015). Penilaian Otentik: Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Nurgiyantoro, B.. (2017). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kompetensi. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
Pandean, M. (2018). Kalimat Tanya dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Kajian Linguistik, 5(3), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.35796/kaling.5.3.2018.25030
Safari. (2019). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Penyusunan Kisi-Kisi, Penulisan, dan Analisis Butir Soal Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 Menuju Penilaian Abad 21. Jakarta: Erlangga
Safi’i, I., & Yanti, P. G. (2019). Mengidentifikasi Model Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi dalam E-Book Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Pembelajar: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.26858/pembelajar.v3i1.12603
Safi’i, I., Listeani, F. Y., & Tarmini, W. (2020). Kevaliditasan Instrumen Evaluasi dalam BSE Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, 21(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.24036/komposisi.v21i1.108716
Sugono, D. (2009). Mahir Berbasa Indonesia dengan Benar. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Supardi. (2015). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Suryaman, Maman. (2019). Dimensi-Dimensi Kontekstual di Dalam Penulisan Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. DIKSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, 13(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v13i2.6456
Utama, Z. P., Maison, Syarkowi, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Bernalar Siswa SMA Kota Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v9i1.2223
Wisiasworo, E. (2019). Guru Ideal di Era Digital. Depok: Huta Parhapuran.
Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Zahro, N. H. (2019). Uji Kompetensi Pada Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE). Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS, 7(2), 134-149 https://doi.org/10.36841/pgsdunars.v7i2.480