Identifikasi Konteks Ekstralingual Virtual Bahasa Media Sosial sebagai Penunjang Analisis Bahasa sebagai Alat Bukti Hukum Identification of the Virtual Extralingual Context of Social Media Language as Support for Language Analysis as a Legal Evidence Tool
Article Sidebar
Published:
Feb 1, 2022
Keywords:
context, extralingual context, virtual extralingual context
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of the negative impacts of social media is the rise of language wars. Investigators involve linguists in handling language cases as evidence. In addition to considering lingual elements, linguists also need to pay attention to extralingual elements. One of the extralingual elements can be identified with SPEAKING Dell Hymes. Analysis of social media language needs to pay attention to the virtual extralingual context. This study aims to reveal the virtual extralingual context on social media. The results of this study are useful in the study of forensic linguistics. This research uses the descriptive qualitative method. Research data in language use in social media and language reports as legal evidence. The data sources are social media and police reports which are collected with documentation, listening, and followed by note-taking techniques. Data analysis used the extralingual equivalent method. The results show that each social media has language use characteristics that are influenced by user segments and service features. These characteristics will continue to change following the development of social media features and services. The virtual context of one social media cannot be used to understand the context of another social media. The forensic linguistic analysis makes the results of the analysis scientifically and legally accountable. It is based on the consideration that every result of language analysis as legal evidence made by linguists impacts one's fate.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Kusno, A., Arifin, M. B., & Mulawarman, W. G. (2022). Identifikasi Konteks Ekstralingual Virtual Bahasa Media Sosial sebagai Penunjang Analisis Bahasa sebagai Alat Bukti Hukum. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(1s), 261-282. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i1s.401
Issue
Section
Articles
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Amin, A. (2012). Bahasa Indonesia termasuk paling cocok di dunia untuk Twitter. Retrieved from Merdeka.com website: https://m.merdeka.com/teknologi/bahasa-indonesia-termasuk-paling-cocok-di-dunia-untuk-twitter.html
Aziz, E. A. (2020). Model Resolusi Konflik Kebahasaan: Sebauh Refleksi Pengalaman. Jakarta.
Christianto, H. (2018). Perbuatan Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Ragam dan Studi Kasus. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
CNN-Indonesia. (2020). Tagih Utang Istri Polisi via Medsos, Warga Medan Terancam Bui. Retrieved from CNN Indonesia website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200715131900-12-524950/tagih-utang-istri-polisi-via-medsos-warga-medan-terancam-bui
CNN-Indonesia. (2021). Jejak Kasus Jerinx “IDI Kacung WHO” Hingga Bebas. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210608085701-12-651556/jejak-kasus-jerinx-idi-kacung-who-hingga-bebas
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Efendi, R. (2020). Tok, Terdakwa Pencemar Nama Baik Istri Kombes Polisi Divonis Bebas. Retrieved from Liputan6.com website: https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/4376137/tok-terdakwa-pencemar-nama-baik-istri-kombes-polisi-divonis-bebas
Fahri, F. (2020). Kenali Segmentasi Media Sosial, Maksimalkan Penggunaannya.
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_39
Ibrahim, A. S. (1994). Etnografi Komunikasi. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Isosävi, J. (2020). Cultural Outsiders’ Reported Adherence to Finnish and French Politeness Norms. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.015
Iswatiningsih, D. (2016). Etnografi Komunikasi: Sebuah Pendekatan dalam Mengkaji Perilaku Masyarakat Tutur Perempuan Jawa. Seminar Nasional Prasasti (Pragmatik: Sastra Dan Linguistik). Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/446
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative Research Method-Interviewing and Observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Jhon Turell, M. T. G. (2008). Introduction. In J. Gibbons & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5
Kusno, A. (2015). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesopanan Pada Kasus Delik Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik. In S. Haryanto, B. Burhanuddin, & H. Pratama (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Prasasti: Kajian Pragmatik dalam Berbaga Bidang (II, pp. 88--93). Surakarta: Program Studi s3 Linguistik Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Kusno, A. (2021). Redefinisi Kosakata Terkait Perang Bahasa (Kajian Linguistik Forensik). Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.183
Lestari, R. P. (2020). Kepanjangan atau Ngga Ya? Ini Dia Ukuran Terbaik Postingan di Facebook, Twitter, dan Instagrammu! Retrieved from Ilmupedia website: https://ilmupedia.co.id/articles/ukuran-terbaik-postingan-sosial-media/full
Locher, M. A., & Bousfield, D. (2008). Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language. In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp. 1–13). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Retrieved from https://edoc.unibas.ch/14557/1/20131011104605_5257bacd3f7ab.pdf
M., Y. (2020). Polisi Masih Cari Tahu Pemilik Akun Twitter @digeeembok. Retrieved from Merdeka.com website: https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/polisi-masih-cari-tahu-pemilik-akun-twitter-digeeembok.html
Mardiasih, K. (2018). Para Anonim dan Hilangnya Kepakaran di Media Sosial. Retrieved from Detiknews website: https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4090040/para-anonim-dan-hilangnya-kepakaran-di-media-sosial
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
Mintowati. (2016). Pencemaran Nama Baik: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Paramasastra, 3(2), 197–208. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/paramasastra/article/view/1525
Mulyana, K. E. (2021). Alasan Orang Menggunakan Akun Anonim di Medsos. Retrieved from Kompas.com website: https://www.kompas.tv/article/209988/alasan-orang-menggunakan-akun-anonim-di-medsos
Pranowo. (2009). Berbahasa Secara Santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Putri, V. M. (2020). Tahun 2019, Twitter Kembali Jaya di Indonesia. Retrieved from Detikinet website: https://inet.detik.com/mobile-apps/d-4905885/tahun-2019-twitter-kembali-jaya-di-indonesia
Rahard, R. K. (2017). Linguistic Impoliteness in the Sociopragmatic Perspective. Humaniora, 29(3), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i3.24954
Rahardi, K., Setyaningsih, Y., & Dewi, R. P. (2020). Pragmatik: Fenomena Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa (4th ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rizen, Al. (2017). Mencuit akan Jadi Lebih Mudah. Retrieved from Twitter website: https://blog.twitter.com/in_id/topics/product/2017/Mencuit-akan-Jadi-Lebih-Mudah
Safety, T. (2020). Memperbarui Peraturan Twitter tentang Perilaku Kebencian. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/in_id/topics/company/2019/Memperbarui-peraturan-Twitter-tentang-perilaku-kebencian
Saifudin, A. (2019). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Linguistik. LiTE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v15i1.2382
Sholihatin, E. (2019). Linguistik Forensik dan Kejahatan Berbahasa (N. Haryono, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sorlin, S. (2017). The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting im/politeness Theories. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.002
Su, H.-Y. (2019). The Metapragmatics of Taiwanese (im)politeness: Conceptualization and Evaluation of Limao. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.018
Sumarsono, & Paina, P. (2002). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Ye, Z. (2019). The Politeness Bias and the Society of Strangers. Language Sciences, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.06.009
Yin, R. K. (2021). Studi Kasus: Desain & Metode (17th ed.; Mudzakir Djauzi, Ed.). Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Aziz, E. A. (2020). Model Resolusi Konflik Kebahasaan: Sebauh Refleksi Pengalaman. Jakarta.
Christianto, H. (2018). Perbuatan Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Ragam dan Studi Kasus. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
CNN-Indonesia. (2020). Tagih Utang Istri Polisi via Medsos, Warga Medan Terancam Bui. Retrieved from CNN Indonesia website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200715131900-12-524950/tagih-utang-istri-polisi-via-medsos-warga-medan-terancam-bui
CNN-Indonesia. (2021). Jejak Kasus Jerinx “IDI Kacung WHO” Hingga Bebas. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210608085701-12-651556/jejak-kasus-jerinx-idi-kacung-who-hingga-bebas
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Efendi, R. (2020). Tok, Terdakwa Pencemar Nama Baik Istri Kombes Polisi Divonis Bebas. Retrieved from Liputan6.com website: https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/4376137/tok-terdakwa-pencemar-nama-baik-istri-kombes-polisi-divonis-bebas
Fahri, F. (2020). Kenali Segmentasi Media Sosial, Maksimalkan Penggunaannya.
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_39
Ibrahim, A. S. (1994). Etnografi Komunikasi. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Isosävi, J. (2020). Cultural Outsiders’ Reported Adherence to Finnish and French Politeness Norms. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.015
Iswatiningsih, D. (2016). Etnografi Komunikasi: Sebuah Pendekatan dalam Mengkaji Perilaku Masyarakat Tutur Perempuan Jawa. Seminar Nasional Prasasti (Pragmatik: Sastra Dan Linguistik). Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/446
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative Research Method-Interviewing and Observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Jhon Turell, M. T. G. (2008). Introduction. In J. Gibbons & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5
Kusno, A. (2015). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesopanan Pada Kasus Delik Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik. In S. Haryanto, B. Burhanuddin, & H. Pratama (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Prasasti: Kajian Pragmatik dalam Berbaga Bidang (II, pp. 88--93). Surakarta: Program Studi s3 Linguistik Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Kusno, A. (2021). Redefinisi Kosakata Terkait Perang Bahasa (Kajian Linguistik Forensik). Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.183
Lestari, R. P. (2020). Kepanjangan atau Ngga Ya? Ini Dia Ukuran Terbaik Postingan di Facebook, Twitter, dan Instagrammu! Retrieved from Ilmupedia website: https://ilmupedia.co.id/articles/ukuran-terbaik-postingan-sosial-media/full
Locher, M. A., & Bousfield, D. (2008). Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language. In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp. 1–13). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Retrieved from https://edoc.unibas.ch/14557/1/20131011104605_5257bacd3f7ab.pdf
M., Y. (2020). Polisi Masih Cari Tahu Pemilik Akun Twitter @digeeembok. Retrieved from Merdeka.com website: https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/polisi-masih-cari-tahu-pemilik-akun-twitter-digeeembok.html
Mardiasih, K. (2018). Para Anonim dan Hilangnya Kepakaran di Media Sosial. Retrieved from Detiknews website: https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4090040/para-anonim-dan-hilangnya-kepakaran-di-media-sosial
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
Mintowati. (2016). Pencemaran Nama Baik: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Paramasastra, 3(2), 197–208. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/paramasastra/article/view/1525
Mulyana, K. E. (2021). Alasan Orang Menggunakan Akun Anonim di Medsos. Retrieved from Kompas.com website: https://www.kompas.tv/article/209988/alasan-orang-menggunakan-akun-anonim-di-medsos
Pranowo. (2009). Berbahasa Secara Santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Putri, V. M. (2020). Tahun 2019, Twitter Kembali Jaya di Indonesia. Retrieved from Detikinet website: https://inet.detik.com/mobile-apps/d-4905885/tahun-2019-twitter-kembali-jaya-di-indonesia
Rahard, R. K. (2017). Linguistic Impoliteness in the Sociopragmatic Perspective. Humaniora, 29(3), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i3.24954
Rahardi, K., Setyaningsih, Y., & Dewi, R. P. (2020). Pragmatik: Fenomena Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa (4th ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rizen, Al. (2017). Mencuit akan Jadi Lebih Mudah. Retrieved from Twitter website: https://blog.twitter.com/in_id/topics/product/2017/Mencuit-akan-Jadi-Lebih-Mudah
Safety, T. (2020). Memperbarui Peraturan Twitter tentang Perilaku Kebencian. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/in_id/topics/company/2019/Memperbarui-peraturan-Twitter-tentang-perilaku-kebencian
Saifudin, A. (2019). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Linguistik. LiTE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v15i1.2382
Sholihatin, E. (2019). Linguistik Forensik dan Kejahatan Berbahasa (N. Haryono, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sorlin, S. (2017). The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting im/politeness Theories. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.002
Su, H.-Y. (2019). The Metapragmatics of Taiwanese (im)politeness: Conceptualization and Evaluation of Limao. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.018
Sumarsono, & Paina, P. (2002). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Ye, Z. (2019). The Politeness Bias and the Society of Strangers. Language Sciences, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.06.009
Yin, R. K. (2021). Studi Kasus: Desain & Metode (17th ed.; Mudzakir Djauzi, Ed.). Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.