Pandangan Pengarang terhadap Perempuan dalam Cerpen Tahun 1950-1960-an Karya Pengarang Peranakan Tionghoa-Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper looks at the views or constructions of Chinese peranakan authors towards women in that era. Issues discussed: (1) how Peranakan authors narrate women in their works; (2) the reasons for the Chinese Peranakan authors in the 1950s-1960s to narrate women. This study uses the point of view of feminist literary criticism. The object of this research is the 1950-1960s short stories and the author's perspective on women. The data of this research is the narrative of short stories that describe the image of women, the author's social construction, and the idea of androcentrism. The data interpretation technique follows the way of feminist literary criticism. The results of the study: (1) women are presented and controlled by men and are controlled by social construction; (2) the idea of morality and the economic context becomes a construction that the author interprets through androcentrism; (3) morality is misinterpreted by male authors and women as victims who are silenced in the name of morality. It has resulted in women being unable to speak up and follow androcentrism in the name of tradition and the sacred concept of morality. Morality is misinterpreted as sexuality and borne by women.
Downloads
Article Details
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Anwar, A. (2012). Teori Sosial Sastra. Ombak.
Chandra, E. (2011). Fantasizing Chinese/Indonesian Hero: Njoo Cheong Seng and the Gagaklodra Series. Archipel, 82(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.3406/arch.2011.4256
Chandra, E. (2013). From Sensation to Oblivion: Boven Digoel in Sino-Malay Novels. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 169, 244–278. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-12340026
Faruk. (2017). Metode Penelitian Sastra. Pustaka Pelajar.
Felski, R. (1989). Beyond Feminist Aesthetics, Feminist Literature and Social Change. Harvard University Press.
Hai, K. T. (1961). Untuk Anakku. Star, 15–16.
Humm, M. (2002). Ensiklopedia Feminisme. Fajar Pustaka Baru.
Hwat, T. S. (1951, April). Gelap Gempita Diwaktu Hudjan. Star, 19–21.
Lubis, A. Y. (2004). Fisalfat Ilmu dan Metodologi Posmodernis. Akademia.
M.L.T. (1955). Rahasia Giok Nio. Star, 26–27.
Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muzakka, M., & Suyanto, S. (2020). The Gender Equality Struggles in the Novel of Perempuan Berkalung Sorban and Gadis Pantai. Jurnal Poetika, 8(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v8i2.60528
Ruthven, K. K. (1985). Feminis Literary Studies: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Saputra, A. D. (2011). Perempuan Subaltern dalam Karya Sastra Indonesia Poskolonial. Literasi, 1(1), 16–30. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/LIT/article/view/649
Susanto, D. (2017a). Subjek Peranakan Tionghoa yang Ambigu dalam Drama Karina-Adinda (1913) Karya Lauw Giok Lan. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v17i2.9654
Susanto, D. (2017b). Chinese Society as Depicted in Early Twentieth Century Chinese-Malay Literature. Wacana, 18(1), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v18i1.580
Susanto, D. (2018). Lekra, Lesbumi, Manifes Kebudayaan, Sejarah Sastra Indonesia Periode 1950-1965. CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service).
Susanto, D., & Ardianto, D. T. (2021). Njoo Cheong Seng: An Artist in the Fight between Liberalism and Eastern Traditions. Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse, 20, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.21315/ws2021.20.2
Sutrisno, E. L. (2010). Reading Lie Kim Hok’s Hikajat Khonghoetjoe: Confucianism and the Virtuous Self in Late Nineteenth Century Colonial Indonesia. University of Washington.
Sutrisno, E. L. (2017). Moral is political Notions of ideal citizenship in Lie Kim Hok’s Hikajat Khonghoetjoe. Wacana, 18(1), 183–215. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v18i1.577
Tawaqal, W., Mursalim, & Hanum, I. S. (2020). Pilihan Hidup Tokoh Utama Zarah Amala dalam Novel “Supernova Episode: Partikel” Karya Dee Lestari: Kajian Feminisme Liberal. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(4), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i4.165
Tjhai, T. S. (1959, May). Jang Pergi dan Jang Ditinggal. Star, 30–31.
Tjhay, T. S. (1955, June). Gadis jang Kubentji. Star, 28–29.
Wardani, A. K., & Geleuk, M. B. (2020). Ketidakadilan Gender pada Pernikahan dalam “Perempuan Patah Hati yang Kembali Menemukan Cinta Melalui Mimpi” Karya Eka Kurniawan. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i3.52