Variasi Penggunaan Strategi Kesantunan sebagai Penanda Subordinasi Mahasiswa dalam Interaksi Lisan Tertulis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Studies on politeness strategies have been carried out in various fields. However, the study in the context of oral and written interactions is still limited. The purpose of this study is to present the use of students' language politeness strategies in oral and written interactions and to reveal the causes of differences in their choice of use. The primary data in this study were 50 instant message texts between students and lecturers. Data were analyzed using the categorization of politeness strategies from Brown & Levinson (1987), which was supported by data from interviews with 7 participants. This study found that 4 out of 5 categories of politeness strategies were used by students, which were dominated by negative politeness strategies. It indicates an awareness of the asymmetric power relationship between the two, which makes them feel the need to be careful so that what is conveyed does not threaten their faces. In addition, it was found that the reasons behind the variation in the use of politeness strategies were related to educational ritualism, looseness of domination of power, the intensity of interaction, and the purpose of sending messages.
Downloads
Article Details
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Ainin, N., Rokhmansyah, A., & Purwanti. (2019). Tipe Tuturan Remaja Perempuan Yatim dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari: Kajian Pragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v2i1.14
Arifin, S., Yahya, M., & Siddik, M. (2019). Strategi Komunikasi Siswa Dan Guru Kelas XI SMAN 2 Sangatta Utara Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v2i1.15
Arimi, S. (2009). Ihwal Metode Penelitian Sosiolinguistik. Prosiding Seminar Internasional PLU 6.
Brown, P., & Lavinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Eksan, E. R., Hafid. A., & Putra, T. Y. (2021). Kesantunan berbahasa mahasiswa terhadap dosen di Unimuda Sorong: Tinjauan pragmatik. Jurnal Frasa: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 16–23.
Holmes, J. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Longman.
Husna, L. L., & Arief, E. (2020). Strategi kesantunan bertutur mahasiswa kepada dosen melalui komunikasi WhatsApp. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(4), 13–22.
Mawane, A., & Setiawati, E. (2011). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam sistem layanan pesan singkat: Analisis wacana interaksi antara mahasiswa dan dosen Universitas Cenderawasih. Jurnal Artikulasi, 12(2), 830–846.
Multasih, S. (2014). Strategi Kesantunan pada Pesan Singkat (SMS) Mahasiswa ke Dosen. Prosiding Prasasti.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1
Rahmi, U., Tressyalina, & Noveria, E. (2018). Kesantunan bahasa sms (short message service) mahasiswa terhadap dosen jurusan Bahasa Indonesia pada semester ganjil 2017/2018 di Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin Solok. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(7), 70–78.
Rohman, A. (1999). Subordinasi siswa dan dominasi guru: Tinjauan kritis mengenai politik wacana pendidikan. Dinamika Pendidikan, 1(6).
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
Saputry, D. (2016). Strategi kesantunan positif dan negatif dalam bentuk tuturan direktif di lingkungan STKIP Muhammadiyah Pringsewu Lampung. Jurnal Pesona, 2(1), 149–160.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistics. Duta Wahana University Press.
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to Sociolinguistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.