Modalitas Epistemik -Hazu Da dan Padanannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia

Main Article Content

Isye Herawati
Fahri Delfariyadi

Abstract

Japanese epistemic modality can be expressed through by linguistic markers, such as adverb markers indicate the gradient or level of the speaker’s assumptions about a specific phenomenon. This study aims to investigate the epistemic modality of Japanese -hazu da and its Indonesian equivalent. This study utilized descriptive and qualitative methods, and data were obtained from various novels and Shonagon corpus. The findings of the present study are the adverbs and grammatical components that appear with modal auxiliary verbs, resulting in different epistemic gradations, notably uncertainty in the lowest rank, expectation/reasonable prediction, agreement/consent, disaffirmation, and strong negation, as well as strong affirmation in the highest rank. The Indonesia equivalent derived from this modality are ‘mungkin’, ‘tentunya’, ‘pastinya’, ‘kalau tidak salah’, and ‘mana mungkin’. The speaker’s logical reasoning and assumption supported by the contextual aspect and grammatical items in sentences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Herawati, I., & Delfariyadi, F. (2023). Modalitas Epistemik -Hazu Da dan Padanannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i1.577
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Isye Herawati, Universitas Padjajaran

Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Ir. Soekarno km 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia
Email: isye.herawati@unpad.ac.id
Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2334-3105

Fahri Delfariyadi, Universitas Padjadjaran

Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Ir. Soekarno km 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia
Email: fahri18001@mail.unpad.ac.id
Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4345-0493

References

A’yun, I. Q., Roni, & Nurhadi, D. (2020). The Contrastive Analysis of Epistemic Modalities and Japanese and Indonesia Evidentialities in the Kokoro Novel by Natsume Soseki. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(2), 489–494. https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/1797
Ainin, N., Rokhmansyah, A., & Purwanti. (2019). Tipe Tuturan Remaja Perempuan Yatim dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari: Kajian Pragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v2i1.14
Ardiati, R. L., Ginanjar, P. Y., & Sidiq, I. I. (2019). Adverbia Bahasa Jepang (1st Ed). Unpad Press.
Biber, D. (2010). What can a Corpus Tell Us about Registers and Genres? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (1st Ed, pp. 241–254). Routledge.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2012). Basic Linguistic Theory: Volume 3 Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford University Press.
Harunasari, S. Y., & Halim, N. (2021). Gegar Bahasa pada Program Pertukaran Mahasiswa Indonesia di Jepang: Sebuah Studi Kasus. Diglosia, 4(4), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i4.212
Herawati, I., Johana, J., & Rahmat, N. (2019). Pengantar Modalitas Epistemik bahasa Jepang Volume 1 (1st Ed). Unpad Press.
Herawati, I., Johana, J., & Rismelati, R. (2017). Modus Ganda dalam Modalitas Epistemik Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Struktur dan Semantik. The 1st International Conference on Language, Literature and Teaching, 499–506. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/8902
Herawati, I., Rahmat, N., & Andrayani, Y. (2017). Konstrastivitas Modalitas Epistemik Gabungan dalam Bahasa Jepang dan Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Struktur dan Makna. Jurnal Nihongo, 9(2), 31–41.
Isao, I., Shino, T., Kumiko, N., & Toshihiro, Y. (2001). Nihongo Bunpou Handobukku II. Suriienettowaaku.
Koizumi, T. (2014). Nihongo Kyoushi no Tame no Gengogaku Nyuumon. Taishuukan Shoten.
Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus Linguistik. Gramedia.
Larm, L. (2014). Modality Packaging in Japanese: The Encoding of Modal Meanings and Subjectivity. Studies in Pragmatics, 16, 20–46. http://pragmatics.gr.jp/content/files/SIP_016/SIP_16_Larm.pdf
Lauwereyns, S. (2002). Hedges in Japanese Conversation: The Influence of Age, Sex, and Formality. Language Variation and Change, 14(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502142049
Lida, U. M. (2022). Struktur Isi Argumen dalam Teks Argumentasi Siswa Tahap Operasi Formal. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.318
Makino, S., & Tsutsui, M. (1986). A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Kyoto Sangyo University Press.
Matsuura, K. (1994). Kamus Bahasa Jepang-Indonesia. Kyoto Sangyo University Press.
Maynard, S. K. (1993). Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in the Japanese Language. John Benjamin Publishing.
Nitta, Y. (2003). Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo 4. Kuroshio.
Nurfitri, N., Risagarniwa, Y. Y., & Kadir, P. M. (2014). Modalitas Epistemik Pengungkap Perkiraan (Shi) Souda dan Padanannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Sintaksis dan Semantik. Aksara, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v26i1.144.57-66
Takubo, Y. (2009). Japanese Modality. In B. Pizziconi & M. Kizu (Eds.), Japanese Modality: Exploring its Scope and Interpretation (1st Ed, pp. 150–182). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245754
Willer, M. (2013). Dynamics of Epistemic Modality. Philosophical Review, 122(1), 45–92. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1728714
Yamada, T., Shibata, T., Sakai, K., Kuramochi, Y., Yamada, A., Uwano, S., Ijima, M., & Sasahara, H. (2017). Shinmeikai Kokugo Jiten (7th ed.). Sanseido.
Zaim, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Pendekatan Struktural. UNP Press.
Zufferey, S. (2020). Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. ISTE.