Analisis perspektif kritis generasi z terhadap wacana pada media sosial Critical perspective analysis of Gen Z toward discourse on social media
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 11, 2023
Keywords:
critical perspective, discourse, gen Z, social media, youth organization
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to know the perspective of Gen Z in understanding the discourse contained in social media. The perspective means the ability to change Gen z’s perspective in understanding the text on social media, the ability to see points of view, focus on a developing issue, and describe how to take action after understanding a discourse. The research method used the quantitative method. Respondents of this research are Gen Z, who are active in youth organizations. Data collection techniques are observation and questionnaire. The results showed that Gen Z had detected a discourse that contains partiality to certain interests by providing a different perspective. It can be seen in the positive response on the average instrument (mean) above 53%; able to provide a more neutral point of view with the number of positive responses on the average instrument above (mean) 51%; able to see a developing issue in a discourse that has a tendency from the author with a positive response above 56%; and able to take action from the discourse that has been read with an average positive response above 59%.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Kasmantoni, K., & Putra, P. P. (2023). Analisis perspektif kritis generasi z terhadap wacana pada media sosial. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 681-696. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.698
Issue
Section
Articles
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
APJII. (2016). Infografis Penetrasi dan Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesi Survey 2016. Jakarta: Asosiasi Penyelenggara Riset Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://apjii.or.id/downfile/filesurveipenetrasiinternet2016.pdf
APJII. (2018). Infografis Penetrasi dan Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia Survei 2017. Jakarta: Asosiasi Penyelenggara Riset Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://apjii.or.id/survei2017
Billig, M. (2002). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Rhetoric of Critique. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 25–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
Chambers, J. M., & Radbourne, C. L. (2015). Developing Critical Literacy Skills through Using the Environment As Text. Language and Literacy, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20360/G2FK58
Chayadi S., H., Alamsyah, M., Izzrufi, M. I., Racinta L., S., & Saepudin, E. (2021). Persepsi Mahasiswa/i terhadap Wacana Amandemen UUD NRI 1945 (Survei terhadap Mahasiswa STEI ITB Angkatan 2018). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v5i1.1440
Dutro, E. (2010). What “Hard Times” Means: Mandated Curricula, Class-Privileged Assumptions, and the Lives of Poor Children. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(3), 255–291. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27784362
Grail Research. (2011). Consumers of Tomorrow: Insights and Observations About Generation Z. https://www.slideshare.net/johnyvo/consumers-of-tomorrowinsightsandobservationsaboutgenerationz-25226677
Harjito. (2014). Hegemoni Gramsci dalam Sastra Indonesia: Student Hijo, Nasionalisme, dan Wacana Kolonial. Upgris Press.
Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoritical and Methodological Aspect of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 34–61). Sage Publication.
Kuo, J. M. (2013). Implementing Critical Literacy for University Freshmen in Taiwan through Self-Discovery Texts. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 549–557. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-013-0057-1
Lee, C. (2012). From Disrupting the Commonplace to Taking Action in Literacy Education. Journal of Thought, 47(2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/jthought.47.2.6
Lewison, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on Critical Literacy: The Journey of Newcomers and Novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382–392. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41483258
Lie, K. Y., Fei, W. F., Ismail, K., Kee, C. P., & Yasin, M. S. M. (2011). Literasi Kritikal dalam Konteks Pendidikan Tinggi: Suara dari Sebuah Bilik Darjah di Malaysia. GEMA Online: Journal of Language Studies, 99–119. https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/59
Mailawati. (2023). Analisis Fungsi Tindak Tutur Direktif dalam Konteks Bayar Sewa. DIGLOSIA: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 6, 289–302. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.601
McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical Literacy as Comprehension: Expanding Reader Response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.48.1.5
Mulcahy, C. M. (2008). The Tangled Web We Weave: Critical Literacy and Critical Thinking. In L. Wallowitz (Ed.), Critical Literacy as Resistance: Teaching for Social Justice Across the Secondary Curriculum (pp. 15–27). Peter Lang. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42980102
Mustika, V. E. (2018). Kepercayaan Mahasiswa terhadap Pemberitaan di Instagram [Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/62341/
Pardede, P., Rasyid, Y., & Anwar, M. (2023). Manipulasi Linguistik sebagai Instrumen Politik dalam Animal Farm: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.605
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Analytic Thinking, Motivated Reasoning, Political Ideology, and Bullshit Receptivity. SSRN Electronic Journal, 24(6), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3023545
Sariasih, W., Rasyid, Y., & Anwar, M. (2023). Analisis Wacana Kritis Sara Mills dalam Cerpen Sepasang Mata Dinaya yang Terpenjara. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.607
Shuqair, S., & Cragg, P. (2017). The Immediate Impact of Instagram Posts on Changing the Viewers Perceptions Towards Travel Destinations. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Business and Social Studies, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25275/apjabssv3i2bus1
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tapscott, D. (2013). Grown Up Digital: Yang Muda Yang Mengubah Dunia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Utomo, E. P., & Probosini, N. (2020). Pengaruh Sikap dan Norma Subjektif terhadap Intensitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Streaming pada Generasi “Z.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v9i2.18581
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Analysis, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514560_1
Wetherell, M. (2001). Discourse as Data. The Open University.
APJII. (2018). Infografis Penetrasi dan Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia Survei 2017. Jakarta: Asosiasi Penyelenggara Riset Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://apjii.or.id/survei2017
Billig, M. (2002). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Rhetoric of Critique. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 25–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
Chambers, J. M., & Radbourne, C. L. (2015). Developing Critical Literacy Skills through Using the Environment As Text. Language and Literacy, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20360/G2FK58
Chayadi S., H., Alamsyah, M., Izzrufi, M. I., Racinta L., S., & Saepudin, E. (2021). Persepsi Mahasiswa/i terhadap Wacana Amandemen UUD NRI 1945 (Survei terhadap Mahasiswa STEI ITB Angkatan 2018). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v5i1.1440
Dutro, E. (2010). What “Hard Times” Means: Mandated Curricula, Class-Privileged Assumptions, and the Lives of Poor Children. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(3), 255–291. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27784362
Grail Research. (2011). Consumers of Tomorrow: Insights and Observations About Generation Z. https://www.slideshare.net/johnyvo/consumers-of-tomorrowinsightsandobservationsaboutgenerationz-25226677
Harjito. (2014). Hegemoni Gramsci dalam Sastra Indonesia: Student Hijo, Nasionalisme, dan Wacana Kolonial. Upgris Press.
Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoritical and Methodological Aspect of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 34–61). Sage Publication.
Kuo, J. M. (2013). Implementing Critical Literacy for University Freshmen in Taiwan through Self-Discovery Texts. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 549–557. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-013-0057-1
Lee, C. (2012). From Disrupting the Commonplace to Taking Action in Literacy Education. Journal of Thought, 47(2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/jthought.47.2.6
Lewison, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on Critical Literacy: The Journey of Newcomers and Novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382–392. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41483258
Lie, K. Y., Fei, W. F., Ismail, K., Kee, C. P., & Yasin, M. S. M. (2011). Literasi Kritikal dalam Konteks Pendidikan Tinggi: Suara dari Sebuah Bilik Darjah di Malaysia. GEMA Online: Journal of Language Studies, 99–119. https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/59
Mailawati. (2023). Analisis Fungsi Tindak Tutur Direktif dalam Konteks Bayar Sewa. DIGLOSIA: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 6, 289–302. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.601
McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical Literacy as Comprehension: Expanding Reader Response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.48.1.5
Mulcahy, C. M. (2008). The Tangled Web We Weave: Critical Literacy and Critical Thinking. In L. Wallowitz (Ed.), Critical Literacy as Resistance: Teaching for Social Justice Across the Secondary Curriculum (pp. 15–27). Peter Lang. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42980102
Mustika, V. E. (2018). Kepercayaan Mahasiswa terhadap Pemberitaan di Instagram [Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/62341/
Pardede, P., Rasyid, Y., & Anwar, M. (2023). Manipulasi Linguistik sebagai Instrumen Politik dalam Animal Farm: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.605
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Analytic Thinking, Motivated Reasoning, Political Ideology, and Bullshit Receptivity. SSRN Electronic Journal, 24(6), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3023545
Sariasih, W., Rasyid, Y., & Anwar, M. (2023). Analisis Wacana Kritis Sara Mills dalam Cerpen Sepasang Mata Dinaya yang Terpenjara. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.607
Shuqair, S., & Cragg, P. (2017). The Immediate Impact of Instagram Posts on Changing the Viewers Perceptions Towards Travel Destinations. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Business and Social Studies, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25275/apjabssv3i2bus1
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tapscott, D. (2013). Grown Up Digital: Yang Muda Yang Mengubah Dunia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Utomo, E. P., & Probosini, N. (2020). Pengaruh Sikap dan Norma Subjektif terhadap Intensitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Streaming pada Generasi “Z.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v9i2.18581
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Analysis, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514560_1
Wetherell, M. (2001). Discourse as Data. The Open University.