Sebuah pemikiran perlawanan Chudori terhadap cengkeraman kekuasaan dalam Laut Bercerita Chudori’s ideology of counter-hegemony in “Laut Bercerita”
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to prove the ideology of resistance of Leila Salikha Chudori towards oppressive force via Laut Bercerita. Literary work is a product of the author’s critical thinking; therefore, it is important to understand Chudori’s ideology in her work. From a Marxist point of view, there is a battle for domination in every society. This study tries to understand where is the ideological position of Chudori in the battle for domination. The method used to conduct this research is qualitative descriptive. Research on Laut Bercerita was a literature study that uses a Marxist approach. Theories that will be used are Antonio Gramsci's Theory of Hegemony and Louis Althusser's Theory of State Apparatus. The study concludes that Chudori is a figure of resistance in a battle for domination, which means Chudori's ideological position belongs to the group that refuses to be dominated.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy. Monthly Review Press.
Andani, N. S., Raharjo, R. P., & Indiarti, T. (2022). Kritik Sosial Dan Nilai Moral Individu Tokoh Utama Dalam Novel Laut Bercerita Karya Leila S. Chudori. Enggang: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 3(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.37304/enggang.v3i1.7832
Ashri, M., & Syahwal, S. (2023). Potret Hukum Diskriminatif Orde Baru: Tinjauan Hukum dan Politik Atas Diskriminasi terhadap Eks Tahanan Politik PKI. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 4(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v4i2.1070
Ashri, M., Magassing, M., & Sakharina, I. K. (2021). Hak atas Kebenaran Bagi Korban Penghilangan Orang secara Paksa Periode 1997-1998. Jurnal Jentera, 4(2), 495–514. https://jurnal.jentera.ac.id/index.php/jentera/article/view/37
Bird, J. (1999). Indonesia in 1998: The Pot Boils Over. Asian Survey, 39(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645591
Cere, R. (2016). Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony in Postcolonial Media Theory and Culture. In K. Merten & L. Krämer (Eds.), Post-Colonial Studies meets Media Studies: A Critical Encounter (pp. 125–142). The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839432945-007
Chudori, L. S. (2017). Laut Bercerita. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Chudori, L. S. (2020). 74. Dari Perspektif Leila Chudori tentang Tragedi Mei 98 dan Novel Laut Bercerita. Menjadi Manusia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYSMXknVKMo
Cribb, R. (2010). The Historical Roots of Indonesia’s New Order: Beyond the Colonial Comparison. In E. Aspinall & G. Fealy (Eds.), Soeharto’s New Order and its Legacy: Essays in honour of Harold Crouch (1st ed., pp. 67–80). ANU ePress. https://doi.org/10.22459/SNOL.08.2010.05
Eddyono, A. S. (2021). Pers Alternatif pada Era Orde Baru: Dijinakkan hingga Dibungkam. Komunika, 8(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.22236/komunika.v8i1.5672
Eyerman, R. (2003). Cultural Trauma. Cambridge University Press.
Farchan, Y. (2022). Dinamika Sistem Politik Otoritarianisme Orde Baru. Jurnal Adhikari, 1(3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.53968/ja.v1i3.41
Flynn, S. (2021). Revisiting Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis for Contemporary Social Work. Irish Journal of Sociology, 29(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0791603519884201
Furqan, R. A., Arbain, A., & Putri, S. M. (2023). Genosida dan Trauma dalam Novel Laut Bercerita. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 11(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v11i1.119834
Gramsci, A. (1992). Prison Notebooks. International Publishers.
Hadi, D. W., & Kasuma, G. (2012). Propaganda Orde Baru 1966-1980. Verleden, 1(1), 40–50. https://journal.unair.ac.id/filerPDF/4_jurnal propaganda_dwiwahyonohadi.pdf
Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., & Windridge, K. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands / Yorkshire & the Humber. https://oysconmelibrary01.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/introduction-to-qualitative-research-20091.pdf
Hara, A. E. (2001). The Difficult Journey of Democratization in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs23_2g
Himawan, E. M., Pohlman, A., & Louis, W. (2022). Revisiting the May 1998 Riots in Indonesia: Civilians and Their Untold Memories. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034221084320
Iryana, W., & Mustofa, M. B. (2023). May 1998 Mass Riots in Jakarta: A Holistic and Contextual Analysis of Critical Political Communication. Paramita, 33(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v33i2.38022
Liddle, R. W. (1985). Soeharto’s Indonesia: Personal Rule and Political Institutions. Pacific Affairs, 58(1),
68–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2758010
Liddle, R. W., & Mallarangeng, R. (1997). Indonesia in 1996: Pressures from Above and Below. Asian Survey, 37(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645484
Marx, K. (1904). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (2nd ed.). C. H. Kerr.
Nordholt, H. S. (2003). Renegotiating Boundaries, Access, Agency and Identity in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 159(4), 550–589. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254768284
Nugroho, D. A., Muslikh, & Andriyanto. (2022). Keterlibatan Organisasi Gerakan Mahasiswa Nasional Indonesia (GMNI) Cabang Surakarta pada Peristiwa Reformasi 1998 di Kota Solo. Jurnal Siginjai, 2(2), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.22437/js.v2i2.21536
Patria, N. (2020). 79. Dari Perspektif Nezar Patria Tentang Penculikan Aktivis 1998. Menjadi Manusia.
Purdey, J. (2002). Problematizing the Place of Victims in Reformasi Indonesia: A Contested Truth about the May 1998 Violence. Asian Survey, 42(4), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.4.605
Putri, M. K. A., Ashri, A. M., Harmer, C. I. F., Gusnawati, D., & Saputri, W. (2023). Permintaan Maaf Negara Atas Pelanggaran HAM yang Berat sebagai Bentuk Reparasi Korban. Justitia et Pax, 38(2), 429–465. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v38i2.6586
Rahmadhani, A. F., & Wardana, D. J. (2023). Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 2799–2807. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1056
Rahmi, Y. (2021). Representasi Kekerasan dalam Novel Laut Bercerita Karya Leila S. Chudori. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 11(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v11i2.11730
Rajab, B. (2022). Otoritarianisme-birokratik Orde Baru, Krisis Ekonomi dan Politik, dan Demokrasi Formal Masa Reformasi. Jurnal Politik Indonesia, 8(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpi.v8i1.21817
Solihutaufa, E. (2022). Pers dalam Demokratisasi di Indonesia: Kajian tentang Peranan Pers dalam Peristiwa Revolusi Mei 1998. Jurnal Dialektika Politik, 6(2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.37949/jdp.v6i2.17
Suryadinata, L. (2007). The Decline of the Hegemonic Party System in Indonesia: Golkar After the Fall of Soeharto. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(2), 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs29-2f
Suwirta, A. (2018). Pers dan Kritik Sosial pada Masa Orde Baru: Studi Kasus Pers Mingguan Mahasiswa Indonesia di Bandung, 1966-1974. Mimbar Pendidikan, 3(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v3i2.13949
Widyanti, R. H. D., Fauzi, I. A., & Prasetya, Y. B. (2023). Gerakan Mahasiswa Pada Masa Orde Baru 1974-1978: Dari Malari sampai NKK/BKK. Chronologia, 4(3), 140–153. https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jhe/article/view/11426