Peningkatan penelitian ekokritik tahun 2014—2024: Sebuah analisis bibliometrik The increase of research in ecocriticism 2014—2024: A bibliometric analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study uses a bibliometric approach to analyze the rising trend of ecocriticism research over the past decade. A total of 314 articles were selected based on the keyword ecocriticism from the arts and humanities fields indexed in Scopus between 2014—2014. The study employs bibliometric analysis with the assistance of VOSViewer to reveal patterns and trends in ecocriticism research. The findings are as follows: ecocriticism studies have steadily increased from 2014 to 2024, with a significant surge observed in 2023. Green Letters and CLCWeb were identified as the primary journals publishing ecocriticism-related research. The most productive authors are Dellacasa, Raihanah, and Wardani. The year 2021 recorded the highest scientific impact (h-index 5; g-index 9), while 2022 stood out with the highest number of citations (75 citations across 23 articles), with the most cited article being Arafah et al. (2021), titled Saving the Environment: Environmental Lessons in Colin Thiele’s February Dragon. Geographically, the United Kingdom dominated publication output, whereas Indonesia recorded the highest citation count. The most frequently emerging themes include climate change, environmental degradation, anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, biocentrism, and ecofeminism. This bibliometric analysis also highlights the potential of ecocriticism, an interdisciplinary approach to fostering environmental awareness and informing public policy.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Akingbe, N., & Onanuga, P. A. (2021). Resisting pacification: Locating tension in G’Ebinyo Ogbowei’s poetry. CLCWeb - Comparative Literature and Culture, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3653
Alex, R. K. (2014). A survey of the phases of Indian ecocriticism. CLCWeb - Comparative Literature and Culture, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2616
Alvi, A., Vengadasamy, R., & Majid, A. B. A. (2019). The philosophy of nature in the poetry of ghulam sarwar yousuf and william wordsworth: A comparative ecocritical analysis. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-17
Arafah, B., Abbas, H., & Hikmah, N. (2021). Saving the environment: Environmental lessons in colin thiele’s february dragon. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(6), 935–941. https://doi.org/10.17507/JLTR.1206.09
Arianto, B., Sayuti, S. A., & Efendi, A. (2021). A study of ecocriticism on the representations of ecological conditions in rawa gambut. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 1267–1284. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.19816
Arianto, T., & Simanjuntak, D. S. R. (2020). Representation of ecocriticism in the folklore of mak ungkai spirit. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16822
Aribowo, E. K. (2019). Analisis Bibliometrik Berkala Ilmiah Names: Journal of Onomastics Dan Peluang Riset Onomastik Di Indonesia. Aksara, 31(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v31i1.373.85-105
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Baranovitch, N. (2021). The Ethnic Ecocritical Animal: Animal protagonists and ethnic environmentalism in contemporary Sino-Mongolian literature and art. Modern Asian Studies, 55(3), 1015–1063. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X20000062
Barry, P. (2009). Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester University Press.
Beek, S. van der, & Lehmann, C. (2024). What Can You Do as an Eco-hero? A Study on the Ecopedagogical Potential of Dutch Non-fictional Environmental Texts for Children. Children’s Literature in Education, 55(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-022-09482-z
Caracciolo, M., Ionescu, A., & Fransoo, R. (2019). Metaphorical patterns in Anthropocene fiction. Language and Literature, 28(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947019865450
Chou, S. S. (2014). Wu’s the man with the compound eyes and the worlding of environmental literature. CLCWeb - Comparative Literature and Culture, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2554
Cook, G. (2015). ‘A pig is a person’ or ‘You can love a fox and hunt it’: Innovation and tradition in the discursive representation of animals. Discourse and Society, 26(5), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515576639
Cossio, A., & Simonson, M. (2020). Arboreal tradition and subversion: An ecocritical reading of Shakespeare’s portrayal of trees, woods and forests. Multicultural Shakespeare, 21(36), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.21.06
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(March), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Egya, S. E. (2021). The pristine past, the plundered present: Nature as lost home in Tanure Ojaide’s poetry. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 56(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989418777852
Estok, S. C. (2020). Intermedial apocalypticism and the growing anthropocene crises. Ekphrasis, 24(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.24193/EKPHRASIS.24.11
Firdaus, E. N., & Sukmawan, S. (2022). Pengembangan Metode Menulis Puisi Menggunakan Teknik “Atafora” untuk Meningkatkan Kepekaan Siswa terhadap Lingkungan. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(4), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i4.529
Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-4-34-61
Habsari, W. A. L. (2023). Internalisasi nilai pelestarian alam dan pendidikan karakter melalui representasi kejahatan lingkungan dalam sastra anak karya Okky Madasari. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 625–644. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.692
Harun, M., Artika, W., & Wildan. (2023). Dysphemism in the Form of Hatred and Profanity Towards Forest Destroyers in Indonesian Poetry. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(3), 1627–1646. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.30663
Hooti, N., & Ashrafian, A. (2014). D.H. Lawrence’s St. Mawr: An ecocritical study. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 20(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2002-03
Indriyanto, K. (2020). Aloha Aina: Native Hawai’ians’ environmental perspective in O.A Bushnell’s Ka’a’awa. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n1.04
Juanda, & Azis. (2023). Dolphin Conservation in Pengelana Laut Short Story: Greg Garrard’s Ecocriticism Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(9), 2303–2312. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1309.17
Khosravi, G. D., Vengadasamy, R., & Raihanah, M. M. (2017). Ecoethical significance of wilderness in pablo Neruda’s selected poems. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(3), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1703-04
Lacuna, I. (2021). Atmosfera Rizaliana: Metonymic Journeys of Storm Tropes in José Rizal’s Writing on the Philippines. ETropic, 20(2), 180–208. https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.20.2.2021.3806
Malm, A. (2017). “This is the hell that i have heard of”: Some dialectical images in fossil fuel fiction. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 53(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqw090
Meyer, S. (2021). Ecocritical Concerns in Select Afrikaans Narrative Works: Critical Perspectives. Journal of Literary Studies, 37(4), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564718.2021.1997169
Nofrahadi, Andayani, Suyitno, & Wardani, N. E. (2022). Representation of Functions of Natural Environment Settings in the Kaba Minangkabau: An Ecocritical Study. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(4), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2204-12
O’Connor, M., & Gearey, B. (2020). ‘Black butter melting and opening underfoot’: the ‘peat harvest’ in Irish literature and culture. Green Letters, 24(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2021.1878049
Pal, S., & Pannikot, D. (2023). Ecological Crises of the Capitalocene: A Study on Colleen Murphy’s The Breathing Hole. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(3), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2903-03
Peterson, J. D. (2019). Doing environmental humanities: inter/transdisciplinary research through an underwater 360° video poem. Green Letters, 23(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2019.1583592
Rigby, C. (2019). Weaving the environmental humanities: Australian strands, configurations, and provocations. Green Letters, 23(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2019.1578250
Rinahayu, N., & Kristianto, B. (2022). Konstruksi Hubungan Alam dan Manusia melalui Kerangka Maskulinitas Ekologis dalam Film Jungle (2017): Ekokritik Sastra. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i1.349
Sadouni, B., & Amrieh, Y. A. (2022a). The Stories Trees Tell: Jad El Hage’s The Myrtle Tree and Sinan Antoon’s The Corpse Washer. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 14(3), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.3.13
Sadouni, B., & Amrieh, Y. A. (2022b). The Stories Trees Tell: Jad El Hage’s The Myrtle Tree and Sinan Antoon’s The Corpse Washer. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 14(3), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.3.13
Sakr, R. (2018). The more-than-human refugee journey: Hassan Blasim’s short stories. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 54(6), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2018.1551269
Siwi, P., Arafah, B., Wulan, S., Purwarno, P., Ekalestari, S., & Arafah, A. N. B. (2022). Treatment of Nature: An Ecocriticism Approach in ‘Komat Kamit’ of Tejo and Kamba’s Tuhan Maha Asik. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(7), 1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.05
Størvold, T. (2020). Musical aesthetics below ground: volcanic action and the geosocial in Sigur Rós’s “Brennisteinn.” Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2020.1761060
Sun, Y., & Wang, Q. (2023). Mapping the Field of Register Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218078