Tindak Tutur komisif dalam debat publik pertama calon bupati dan calon wakil bupati Mojokerto pada pilkada tahun 2024 Commisive speech acts in the first public debate of the Mojokerto regent and vice regent candidates in the 2024 regional election
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the form of commissive speech acts in the first public debate of Mojokerto regent and vice-regent candidates; (2) to describe the purpose and context of commissive speech acts in the first public debate of Mojokerto regent and vice-regent candidates The method applied in this research is descriptive qualitative with a pragmatic approach. The data sources in this study are video transcripts of the first public debate of candidates for regent and vice-regent of Mojokerto in the form of words, phrases, or sentences. The debate theme was ‘Regional development strategy in realizing the welfare of the people of Mojokerto Regency.’ The results of this study found 22 commissive speech acts divided into four types: 14 speech acts of promise, 5 speech acts of intention, 3 speech acts of offer, and 1 speech act of refusal. According to the analysis that has been done, it is found that there are messages from both pairs of candidates and their implications that can be a reference for voters in making their choices in the 2024 regional head election.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Al Jufri, M. I., & Wargadinata, W. (2022). Variasi dan Fungsi Tindak Tutur dalam Ceramah KH. Marzuki Mustamar (Kajian Pragmatik). Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(4), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i4.491
Andrasari, L. (2017). Tindak Tutur Komisif dalam Debat Pilkada Kabupaten Sambas tahun 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 6(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v6i4.19835
Ayu Febri Anitasari, Alifah Hasna Salsabila, Icca Dyaz Marshanda, Mukhamad Dwi Prasetyo, Yayang Vintoko, Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo, & Rizqi Amalia Dwi Asih. (2024). Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi dalam Video “Merdeka Belajar” pada Kanal Youtube KEMENDIKBUD RI. Semantik: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya, 2(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.61132/semantik.v2i1.305
Devi, R. P. I., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2021). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi pada Interaksi Jual Beli di Pasar Tradisional Bandarjo Ungaran dalam Kajian Pragmatik. Riksa Bahasa, 6(2), 185–196. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/RBSPs/article/view/24700
Faroh, S., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2020). Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi dalam Vlog Q&A Sesi 3 Pada Kanal Youtube Sherly Annavita Rahmi. Undas: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(2), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.26499/und.v16i2.2793
Habiburrahman, Gani, A. A., & Setiawan, I. (2020). Strategi Tindak Tutur Komisif dalam Kampanye Politik Pilkada Serentak 2018. Jurnal Ilmiah Telaah, 5(1), 1–7. https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/telaah/article/view/1683
Herfani, F. K., & Manaf, N. A. (2020). Tindak Tutur Komisif Dan Ekspresif Dalam Debat Capres-Cawapres Pada Pilpres 2019. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 8(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.24036/81088710
Khasanah, R. P., Kinanti, N. P., Saputri, R. R., Puteri, R. S., Karina, Utomo, A. P. Y., & Nurnaningsih. (2024). Analisis Tindak Tutur Komisif Capres Pada Debat Ke Lima Pemilu 2024. Student Research Journal, 2(4), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.55606/srjyappi.v2i4.1379
Lidiawati, Saman, S., & Sanulita, H. (2018). Tindak Tutur Komisif Dalam Debat Publik Calon Walikota Dan Wakil Walikota Singkawang Tahun 2017. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(10), 1–7. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/29288
Marwuni, W. T., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2020). Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Di Cuitan Akun Twitter @Sudjiwotedjo Pada Bulan Februari 2020. Kadera Bahasa, 12(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.47541/kaba.v12i1.122
Melani, M. V., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2022). Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Akun Baksosapi.gapakemicin dalam Unggahan di Instagram (Suatu Analisis Pragmatik). Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.v3i2.3528
Nugraheni, D., Akhyatussyifa, U., Putri, V. N. V., Khotimah, P. D., Rufaida, N., Utomo, A. P. Y., & Fahmy, Z. (2024). Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi pada Teks Drama dalam Buku Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VIII Kurikulum 2013. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya, 2(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v2i1.299
Putri, S. F. R., Anggraini, L. W., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2022). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Video Ridwan Remin Sindir Gedung DPR Cocok untuk Kos-Kosan. Prawara: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(1), 35–52. https://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/jpbsi/article/view/4923
Rahmawati, M. I. (2021). Maksud Tersembunyi dalam Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Film “Jembatan Pensil, Belajar pada Alam” Karya Hasto Broto. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 12(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v12i2.265
Rokhmansyah, A., Purwanti, P., & Ainin, N. (2019). Pelanggaran Maksim pada Tuturan Remaja Perempuan Yatim: Kajian Psikopragmatik. JP-BSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia), 4(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.26737/jp-bsi.v4i1.887
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Senft, G. (2014). Understanding Pragmatics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203776476
Setyawan, B. W., Hidayah, S. N., & Saddhono, K. (2023). Tindak Tutur Komisif Dalam Pementasan Ketoprak Lakon Rembulan Wungu: Analisis Sociopragmatik. SPHOTA: Jurnal Linguistik Dan Sastra, 15(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v15i2.6903
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Alfabet.
Syukur, S. E. H., Soe’oed, R., & Mulawarman, W. G. (2020). Tindak Tutur Remaja sebagai Anak Tunggal dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari di Kelas: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(4), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i4.128
Yuliani, W. (2018). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif Dalam Perspektif Bimbingan Dan Konseling. QUANTA: Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling Dalam Pendidikan, 2(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.22460/q.v2i2p83-91.1641